[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180421203604.GB14396@avx2>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 23:36:04 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@...il.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rdunlap@...radead.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc/stat: Separate out individual irq counts into
/proc/stat_irqs
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 11:34:22PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:23:02PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > Can we not just remove per-IRQ stats from /proc/stat (since I gather
> > from this discussion it isn't scalable), and just have applications
> > that need per-IRQ stats use /proc/interrupts ?
>
> If you can prove noone is using them in /proc/stat...
And you can't even stick WARN into /proc/stat to find out.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists