lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180421203604.GB14396@avx2>
Date:   Sat, 21 Apr 2018 23:36:04 +0300
From:   Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@...il.com>
Cc:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc/stat: Separate out individual irq counts into
 /proc/stat_irqs

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 11:34:22PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:23:02PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > Can we not just remove per-IRQ stats from /proc/stat (since I gather
> > from this discussion it isn't scalable), and just have applications
> > that need per-IRQ stats use /proc/interrupts ?
> 
> If you can prove noone is using them in /proc/stat...

And you can't even stick WARN into /proc/stat to find out.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ