[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180421073005.GA3744@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 09:30:05 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Amit Shah <amit@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@...el.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] virtio_console: don't tie bufs to a vq
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:18:01PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> an allocated buffer doesn't need to be tied to a vq -
> only vq->vdev is ever used. Pass the function the
> just what it needs - the vdev.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> index 468f061..3e56f32 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static void reclaim_dma_bufs(void)
> }
> }
>
> -static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, size_t buf_size,
> +static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t buf_size,
> int pages)
> {
> struct port_buffer *buf;
> @@ -445,16 +445,16 @@ static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, size_t buf_size,
> return buf;
> }
>
> - if (is_rproc_serial(vq->vdev)) {
> + if (is_rproc_serial(vdev)) {
> /*
> * Allocate DMA memory from ancestor. When a virtio
> * device is created by remoteproc, the DMA memory is
> * associated with the grandparent device:
> * vdev => rproc => platform-dev.
> */
> - if (!vq->vdev->dev.parent || !vq->vdev->dev.parent->parent)
> + if (!vdev->dev.parent || !vdev->dev.parent->parent)
> goto free_buf;
> - buf->dev = vq->vdev->dev.parent->parent;
> + buf->dev = vdev->dev.parent->parent;
>
> /* Increase device refcnt to avoid freeing it */
> get_device(buf->dev);
> @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static ssize_t port_fops_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
>
> count = min((size_t)(32 * 1024), count);
>
> - buf = alloc_buf(port->out_vq, count, 0);
> + buf = alloc_buf(port->portdev->vdev, count, 0);
> if (!buf)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ static ssize_t port_fops_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> if (ret < 0)
> goto error_out;
>
> - buf = alloc_buf(port->out_vq, 0, pipe->nrbufs);
> + buf = alloc_buf(port->portdev->vdev, 0, pipe->nrbufs);
> if (!buf) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto error_out;
> @@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ static unsigned int fill_queue(struct virtqueue *vq, spinlock_t *lock)
>
> nr_added_bufs = 0;
> do {
> - buf = alloc_buf(vq, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> + buf = alloc_buf(vq->vdev, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> if (!buf)
> break;
>
> --
> MST
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists