linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.16 062/196] powerpc/64s: Fix dt_cpu_ftrs to have restore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:51:22 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 062/196] powerpc/64s: Fix dt_cpu_ftrs to have restore_cpu clear unwanted LPCR bits

4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>

commit a57ac411832384eb93df4bfed2bf644c4089720e upstream.

Presently the dt_cpu_ftrs restore_cpu will only add bits to the LPCR
for secondaries, but some bits must be removed (e.g., UPRT for HPT).
Not clearing these bits on secondaries causes checkstops when booting
with disable_radix.

restore_cpu can not just set LPCR, because it is also called by the
idle wakeup code which relies on opal_slw_set_reg to restore the value
of LPCR, at least on P8 which does not save LPCR to stack in the idle
code.

Fix this by including a mask of bits to clear from LPCR as well, which
is used by restore_cpu.

This is a little messy now, but it's a minimal fix that can be
backported.  Longer term, the idle SPR save/restore code can be
reworked to completely avoid calls to restore_cpu, then restore_cpu
would be able to unconditionally set LPCR to match boot processor
environment.

Fixes: 5a61ef74f269f ("powerpc/64s: Support new device tree binding for discovering CPU features")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.12+
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c |   12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static int hv_mode;
 
 static struct {
 	u64	lpcr;
+	u64	lpcr_clear;
 	u64	hfscr;
 	u64	fscr;
 } system_registers;
@@ -92,6 +93,8 @@ static void (*init_pmu_registers)(void);
 
 static void __restore_cpu_cpufeatures(void)
 {
+	u64 lpcr;
+
 	/*
 	 * LPCR is restored by the power on engine already. It can be changed
 	 * after early init e.g., by radix enable, and we have no unified API
@@ -104,8 +107,10 @@ static void __restore_cpu_cpufeatures(vo
 	 * The best we can do to accommodate secondary boot and idle restore
 	 * for now is "or" LPCR with existing.
 	 */
-
-	mtspr(SPRN_LPCR, system_registers.lpcr | mfspr(SPRN_LPCR));
+	lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
+	lpcr |= system_registers.lpcr;
+	lpcr &= ~system_registers.lpcr_clear;
+	mtspr(SPRN_LPCR, lpcr);
 	if (hv_mode) {
 		mtspr(SPRN_LPID, 0);
 		mtspr(SPRN_HFSCR, system_registers.hfscr);
@@ -325,8 +330,9 @@ static int __init feat_enable_mmu_hash_v
 {
 	u64 lpcr;
 
+	system_registers.lpcr_clear |= (LPCR_ISL | LPCR_UPRT | LPCR_HR);
 	lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
-	lpcr &= ~LPCR_ISL;
+	lpcr &= ~(LPCR_ISL | LPCR_UPRT | LPCR_HR);
 	mtspr(SPRN_LPCR, lpcr);
 
 	cur_cpu_spec->mmu_features |= MMU_FTRS_HASH_BASE;