linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.16 165/196] random: set up the NUMA crng instances after the CRNG is fully initialized

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180422135112.807318417@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:53:05 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 165/196] random: set up the NUMA crng instances after the CRNG is fully initialized

4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>

commit 8ef35c866f8862df074a49a93b0309725812dea8 upstream.

Until the primary_crng is fully initialized, don't initialize the NUMA
crng nodes.  Otherwise users of /dev/urandom on NUMA systems before
the CRNG is fully initialized can get very bad quality randomness.  Of
course everyone should move to getrandom(2) where this won't be an
issue, but there's a lot of legacy code out there.  This related to
CVE-2018-1108.

Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Fixes: 1e7f583af67b ("random: make /dev/urandom scalable for silly...")
Cc: stable@...nel.org # 4.8+
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/char/random.c |   46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -786,6 +786,32 @@ static void crng_initialize(struct crng_
 	crng->init_time = jiffies - CRNG_RESEED_INTERVAL - 1;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+static void numa_crng_init(void)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct crng_state *crng;
+	struct crng_state **pool;
+
+	pool = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(*pool), GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOFAIL);
+	for_each_online_node(i) {
+		crng = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct crng_state),
+				    GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL, i);
+		spin_lock_init(&crng->lock);
+		crng_initialize(crng);
+		pool[i] = crng;
+	}
+	mb();
+	if (cmpxchg(&crng_node_pool, NULL, pool)) {
+		for_each_node(i)
+			kfree(pool[i]);
+		kfree(pool);
+	}
+}
+#else
+static void numa_crng_init(void) {}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * crng_fast_load() can be called by code in the interrupt service
  * path.  So we can't afford to dilly-dally.
@@ -892,6 +918,7 @@ static void crng_reseed(struct crng_stat
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&primary_crng.lock, flags);
 	if (crng == &primary_crng && crng_init < 2) {
 		invalidate_batched_entropy();
+		numa_crng_init();
 		crng_init = 2;
 		process_random_ready_list();
 		wake_up_interruptible(&crng_init_wait);
@@ -1729,28 +1756,9 @@ static void init_std_data(struct entropy
  */
 static int rand_initialize(void)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-	int i;
-	struct crng_state *crng;
-	struct crng_state **pool;
-#endif
-
 	init_std_data(&input_pool);
 	init_std_data(&blocking_pool);
 	crng_initialize(&primary_crng);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-	pool = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(*pool), GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOFAIL);
-	for_each_online_node(i) {
-		crng = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct crng_state),
-				    GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL, i);
-		spin_lock_init(&crng->lock);
-		crng_initialize(crng);
-		pool[i] = crng;
-	}
-	mb();
-	crng_node_pool = pool;
-#endif
 	return 0;
 }
 early_initcall(rand_initialize);