linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.18 37/52] ext4: add validity checks for bitmap block numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:54:10 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Wen Xu <wen.xu@...ech.edu>,
        Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Harsh Shandilya <harsh@...kt.io>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 37/52] ext4: add validity checks for bitmap block numbers

3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>

commit 7dac4a1726a9c64a517d595c40e95e2d0d135f6f upstream.

An privileged attacker can cause a crash by mounting a crafted ext4
image which triggers a out-of-bounds read in the function
ext4_valid_block_bitmap() in fs/ext4/balloc.c.

This issue has been assigned CVE-2018-1093.

Backport notes:
3.18.y is missing commit 6a797d273783 ("ext4: call out CRC and corruption errors with specific error codes")
so the EFSCORRUPTED label doesn't exist. Replaced
all instances of EFSCORRUPTED with EUCLEAN since that's
what 6a797d273783 defined it as.

BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199181
BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560782
Reported-by: Wen Xu <wen.xu@...ech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
[harsh@...kt.io: s/EFSCORRUPTED/EUCLEAN/ fs/ext4/balloc.c]
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya <harsh@...kt.io>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/ext4/balloc.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
 fs/ext4/ialloc.c |    8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -340,20 +340,25 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_valid_block_bit
 	/* check whether block bitmap block number is set */
 	blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc);
 	offset = blk - group_first_block;
-	if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
+	if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize ||
+	    !ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
 		/* bad block bitmap */
 		return blk;
 
 	/* check whether the inode bitmap block number is set */
 	blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc);
 	offset = blk - group_first_block;
-	if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
+	if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize ||
+	    !ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
 		/* bad block bitmap */
 		return blk;
 
 	/* check whether the inode table block number is set */
 	blk = ext4_inode_table(sb, desc);
 	offset = blk - group_first_block;
+	if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize ||
+	    EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group) >= sb->s_blocksize)
+		return blk;
 	next_zero_bit = ext4_find_next_zero_bit(bh->b_data,
 			EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group),
 			EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset));
@@ -416,6 +421,7 @@ struct buffer_head *
 ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
 {
 	struct ext4_group_desc *desc;
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
 	struct buffer_head *bh;
 	ext4_fsblk_t bitmap_blk;
 
@@ -423,6 +429,12 @@ ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct sup
 	if (!desc)
 		return NULL;
 	bitmap_blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc);
+	if ((bitmap_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) ||
+	    (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) {
+		ext4_error(sb, "Invalid block bitmap block %llu in "
+			   "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group);
+		return ERR_PTR(-EUCLEAN);
+	}
 	bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk);
 	if (unlikely(!bh)) {
 		ext4_error(sb, "Cannot get buffer for block bitmap - "
--- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
@@ -123,16 +123,22 @@ static struct buffer_head *
 ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
 {
 	struct ext4_group_desc *desc;
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
 	struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
 	ext4_fsblk_t bitmap_blk;
 	struct ext4_group_info *grp;
-	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
 
 	desc = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, block_group, NULL);
 	if (!desc)
 		return NULL;
 
 	bitmap_blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc);
+	if ((bitmap_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) ||
+	    (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) {
+		ext4_error(sb, "Invalid inode bitmap blk %llu in "
+			   "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group);
+		return ERR_PTR(-EUCLEAN);
+	}
 	bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk);
 	if (unlikely(!bh)) {
 		ext4_error(sb, "Cannot read inode bitmap - "