linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 46/95] nfit, address-range-scrub: fix scrub in-progress reporting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180422135212.303990436@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:53:15 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 46/95] nfit, address-range-scrub: fix scrub in-progress reporting

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>

commit 78727137fdf49edf9f731bde79d7189067b4047a upstream.

There is a small window whereby ARS scan requests can schedule work that
userspace will miss when polling scrub_show. Hold the init_mutex lock
over calls to report the status to close this potential escape. Also,
make sure that requests to cancel the ARS workqueue are treated as an
idle event.

Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
Fixes: 37b137ff8c83 ("nfit, libnvdimm: allow an ARS scrub...")
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
@@ -967,8 +967,11 @@ static ssize_t scrub_show(struct device
 	if (nd_desc) {
 		struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc = to_acpi_desc(nd_desc);
 
+		mutex_lock(&acpi_desc->init_mutex);
 		rc = sprintf(buf, "%d%s", acpi_desc->scrub_count,
-				(work_busy(&acpi_desc->work)) ? "+\n" : "\n");
+				work_busy(&acpi_desc->work)
+				&& !acpi_desc->cancel ? "+\n" : "\n");
+		mutex_unlock(&acpi_desc->init_mutex);
 	}
 	device_unlock(dev);
 	return rc;