linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.16 100/196] dm: backfill abnormal IO support to non-splitting IO submission

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180422135109.425346976@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:52:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 100/196] dm: backfill abnormal IO support to non-splitting IO submission

4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>

commit 0519c71e8d461ac3ef9a555bb7339243c9128d37 upstream.

Otherwise, these abnormal IOs would be sent to the DM target
regardless of whether the target advertised support for them.

Factor out __process_abnormal_io() from __split_and_process_non_flush()
so that discards, write same, etc may be conditionally processed.

Fixes: 978e51ba3 ("dm: optimize bio-based NVMe IO submission")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.16
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/dm.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -1477,6 +1477,23 @@ static int __send_write_zeroes(struct cl
 	return __send_changing_extent_only(ci, ti, get_num_write_zeroes_bios, NULL);
 }
 
+static bool __process_abnormal_io(struct clone_info *ci, struct dm_target *ti,
+				  int *result)
+{
+	struct bio *bio = ci->bio;
+
+	if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
+		*result = __send_discard(ci, ti);
+	else if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME)
+		*result = __send_write_same(ci, ti);
+	else if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES)
+		*result = __send_write_zeroes(ci, ti);
+	else
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /*
  * Select the correct strategy for processing a non-flush bio.
  */
@@ -1491,12 +1508,8 @@ static int __split_and_process_non_flush
 	if (!dm_target_is_valid(ti))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	if (unlikely(bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD))
-		return __send_discard(ci, ti);
-	else if (unlikely(bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME))
-		return __send_write_same(ci, ti);
-	else if (unlikely(bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES))
-		return __send_write_zeroes(ci, ti);
+	if (unlikely(__process_abnormal_io(ci, ti, &r)))
+		return r;
 
 	if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_ZONE_REPORT)
 		len = ci->sector_count;
@@ -1617,9 +1630,12 @@ static blk_qc_t __process_bio(struct map
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		tio = alloc_tio(&ci, ti, 0, GFP_NOIO);
 		ci.bio = bio;
 		ci.sector_count = bio_sectors(bio);
+		if (unlikely(__process_abnormal_io(&ci, ti, &error)))
+			goto out;
+
+		tio = alloc_tio(&ci, ti, 0, GFP_NOIO);
 		ret = __clone_and_map_simple_bio(&ci, tio, NULL);
 	}
 out: