[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180422135109.001540448@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:51:51 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Wen Xu <wen.xu@...ech.edu>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 091/196] ext4: add validity checks for bitmap block numbers
4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
commit 7dac4a1726a9c64a517d595c40e95e2d0d135f6f upstream.
An privileged attacker can cause a crash by mounting a crafted ext4
image which triggers a out-of-bounds read in the function
ext4_valid_block_bitmap() in fs/ext4/balloc.c.
This issue has been assigned CVE-2018-1093.
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199181
BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560782
Reported-by: Wen Xu <wen.xu@...ech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/balloc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -338,20 +338,25 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_valid_block_bit
/* check whether block bitmap block number is set */
blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc);
offset = blk - group_first_block;
- if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
+ if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize ||
+ !ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
/* bad block bitmap */
return blk;
/* check whether the inode bitmap block number is set */
blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc);
offset = blk - group_first_block;
- if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
+ if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize ||
+ !ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
/* bad block bitmap */
return blk;
/* check whether the inode table block number is set */
blk = ext4_inode_table(sb, desc);
offset = blk - group_first_block;
+ if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize ||
+ EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group) >= sb->s_blocksize)
+ return blk;
next_zero_bit = ext4_find_next_zero_bit(bh->b_data,
EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group),
EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset));
@@ -417,6 +422,7 @@ struct buffer_head *
ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
{
struct ext4_group_desc *desc;
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
struct buffer_head *bh;
ext4_fsblk_t bitmap_blk;
int err;
@@ -425,6 +431,12 @@ ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct sup
if (!desc)
return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
bitmap_blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc);
+ if ((bitmap_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) ||
+ (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) {
+ ext4_error(sb, "Invalid block bitmap block %llu in "
+ "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
+ }
bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk);
if (unlikely(!bh)) {
ext4_error(sb, "Cannot get buffer for block bitmap - "
--- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static struct buffer_head *
ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
{
struct ext4_group_desc *desc;
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
ext4_fsblk_t bitmap_blk;
int err;
@@ -131,6 +132,12 @@ ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_bloc
return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
bitmap_blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc);
+ if ((bitmap_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) ||
+ (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) {
+ ext4_error(sb, "Invalid inode bitmap blk %llu in "
+ "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
+ }
bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk);
if (unlikely(!bh)) {
ext4_error(sb, "Cannot read inode bitmap - "
Powered by blists - more mailing lists