lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180422135104.594604614@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:50:27 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
        Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 007/196] ubi: Reject MLC NAND

4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>

commit b5094b7f135be34630e3ea8a98fa215715d0f29d upstream.

While UBI and UBIFS seem to work at first sight with MLC NAND, you will
most likely lose all your data upon a power-cut or due to read/write
disturb.
In order to protect users from bad surprises, refuse to attach to MLC
NAND.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Acked-by: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c |   11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
@@ -854,6 +854,17 @@ int ubi_attach_mtd_dev(struct mtd_info *
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Both UBI and UBIFS have been designed for SLC NAND and NOR flashes.
+	 * MLC NAND is different and needs special care, otherwise UBI or UBIFS
+	 * will die soon and you will lose all your data.
+	 */
+	if (mtd->type == MTD_MLCNANDFLASH) {
+		pr_err("ubi: refuse attaching mtd%d - MLC NAND is not supported\n",
+			mtd->index);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	if (ubi_num == UBI_DEV_NUM_AUTO) {
 		/* Search for an empty slot in the @ubi_devices array */
 		for (ubi_num = 0; ubi_num < UBI_MAX_DEVICES; ubi_num++)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists