[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <343B67B0-5FE7-4113-8725-202AC0C8BA8A@holtmann.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 19:58:41 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: John Keeping <john@...anate.com>
Cc: BlueZ development <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
ML netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: use wait_event API instead of open-coding it
Hi John,
> I've seen timeout errors from HCI commands where it looks like
> schedule_timeout() has returned immediately; additional logging for the
> error case gives:
>
> req_status=1 req_result=0 remaining=10000 jiffies
>
> so the device is still in state HCI_REQ_PEND and the value returned by
> schedule_timeout() is the same as the original timeout (HCI_INIT_TIMEOUT
> on a system with HZ=1000).
>
> Use wait_event_interruptible_timeout() instead of open-coding similar
> behaviour which is subject to the spurious failure described above.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@...anate.com>
> ---
> I saw problems with the -rt patchset on 4.9 and I'm not convinced that
> it's Bluetooth at fault for the problem described above, but I think
> this is a nice cleanup even if it's not a bug fix.
>
> net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 30 +++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.
Regards
Marcel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists