[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180423185530.GC66646@dtor-ws>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:55:30 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@...il.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lyan@...e.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
andrii_chepurnyi@...m.com,
Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@...m.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: xen-kbdfront - allow better run-time
configuration
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:29:45AM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 04/23/2018 11:23 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 23/04/18 10:02, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> > > Juergen, Jason, Dmitry
> > > any comment on this?
> > Oleksandr, please give us some time. I can't speak for others, but I am
> > not sitting here idling and hoping that some work (e.g. patches to
> > review) might appear.
> >
> > I have a lot of other stuff to do and will respond when I find some time
> > to look at your patches.
> >
> > Pinging others on Monday when having sent out the patch only on Thursday
> > is rather unfriendly.
> Really sorry about this, my bad.
> I had an impression that the only change we need to
> discuss was uint -> bool change which seemed rather trivial
I am sorry I did not respond to the previous version until today, but I
do not think that we should be extending module parameters for this.
Protocol features are already there for absolute pointers and
multi-touch, keyboard and relative pointers should use the same
mechanism.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists