[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180423074437.1203f39f@mschwideX1>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:44:37 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 15/22] signal/s390: Use force_sig_fault where
appropriate
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:38:04 -0500
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> Filling in struct siginfo before calling force_sig_info a tedious and
> error prone process, where once in a great while the wrong fields
> are filled out, and siginfo has been inconsistently cleared.
>
> Simplify this process by using the helper force_sig_fault. Which
> takes as a parameters all of the information it needs, ensures
> all of the fiddly bits of filling in struct siginfo are done properly
> and then calls force_sig_info.
>
> In short about a 5 line reduction in code for every time force_sig_info
> is called, which makes the calling function clearer.
>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/traps.c | 32 ++++++--------------------------
> arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 23 ++++++-----------------
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
Compiles & boots. Comparing old vs. new the same values are
set in siginfo. Looks good.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky >schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists