[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3699eb1ef15c63a4ea1490be7308d3dd@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:59:46 +0530
From: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] mtd: nand: qcom: fix null pointer access for erased
buffer detection
On 2018-04-22 21:55, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 12:24:16 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
> <absahu@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-04-10 14:42, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> > Hi Abhishek,
>> > > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 18:12:20 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
>> > <absahu@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> > >> parse_read_errors can be called with only oob buf also in which
>> >> case data_buf will be NULL. If data_buf is NULL, then don’t
>> >> treat this page as completely erased in case of ECC uncorrectable
>> >> error.
>> >> >> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c | 7 +++++--
>> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c >> b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
>> >> index 57c16a6..0ebcc55 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
>> >> @@ -1607,9 +1607,11 @@ static int parse_read_errors(struct >> qcom_nand_host *host, u8 *data_buf,
>> >> if (host->bch_enabled) {
>> >> erased = (erased_cw & ERASED_CW) == ERASED_CW ?
>> >> true : false;
>> > > Why the parse_read_errors() function could not be called without
>> > data_buf when using BCH? Are you sure the situation can only happen
>> > without it?
>> >
>> host->bch_enabled case is different where controller itself tells
>> regarding erased page in status register.
>>
>> > Would the following apply here too, with a:
>> >
>> erased_chunk_check_and_fixup will be used only for 4 bit RS ECC
>> code in which there is no support from HW for erased page detection
>> and we need to check few data bytes value.
>
> So please explain this with a comment.
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
Sure Miquel.
I will do the same and update the patch with more comments.
Thanks,
Abhishek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists