[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180423065229.GD4208@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:52:29 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/9] LICENSES/GPL2.0: Add GPL-2.0-only/or-later as valid
identifiers
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:02:12AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Quite some files have been flagged with the new GPL-2.0-only and
> GPL-2.0-or-later identifiers which replace the original GPL-2.0 and
> GPL-2.0+ identifiers in the SPDX license identifier specification, but the
> identifiers are not mentioned as valid in the GPL-2.0 license file.
>
> Add them to make everything consistent again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
As much as I dislike the "new" identifiers, I guess trying to hold them
back is a pointless exercise :(
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists