| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180423085817.74e56091@xps13>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:58:17 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] mtd: nand: qcom: helper function for raw read
Hi Abhishek,
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:58:42 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
<absahu@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 2018-04-22 21:49, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Abhishek,
> > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 12:36:42 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
> > <absahu@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> > >> On 2018-04-10 15:14, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >> > Hi Abhishek,
> >> > > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 18:12:24 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
> >> > <absahu@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> >> > >> This patch does minor code reorganization for raw reads.
> >> >> Currently the raw read is required for complete page but for
> >> >> subsequent patches related with erased codeword bit flips
> >> >> detection, only few CW should be read. So, this patch adds
> >> >> helper function and introduces the read CW bitmask which
> >> >> specifies which CW reads are required in complete page.
> >> > > I am not sure this is the right approach for subpage reads. If the
> >> > controller supports it, you should just enable it in chip->options.
> >> >
> >> Thanks Miquel.
> >> >> It is internal to this file only. This patch makes one static helper
> >> function which provides the support to read subpages.
> > > Drivers should expose raw helpers, why keeping this helper static then?
> > >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c | 186 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >> >> 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c >> b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> >> >> index 40c790e..f5d1fa4 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> >> >> @@ -1590,6 +1590,114 @@ static int check_flash_errors(struct >> qcom_nand_host *host, int cw_cnt)
> >> >> }
> >> >> >> /*
> >> >> + * Helper to perform the page raw read operation. The read_cw_mask >> will be
> >> >> + * used to specify the codewords for which the data should be read. >> The
> >> >> + * single page contains multiple CW. Sometime, only few CW data is >> required
> >> >> + * in complete page. Also, start address will be determined with
> >> >> + * this CW mask to skip unnecessary data copy from NAND flash device. >> Then,
> >> >> + * actual data copy from NAND controller to data buffer will be done >> only
> >> >> + * for the CWs which have the mask set.
> >> >> + */
> >> >> +static int
> >> >> +nandc_read_page_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> >> >> + u8 *data_buf, u8 *oob_buf,
> >> >> + int page, unsigned long read_cw_mask)
> >> >> +{
> >> >> + struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> >> >> + struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> >> >> + struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
> >> >> + int i, ret;
> >> >> + int read_loc, start_step, last_step;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
> >> >> +
> >> >> + host->use_ecc = false;
> >> >> + start_step = ffs(read_cw_mask) - 1;
> >> >> + last_step = fls(read_cw_mask);
> >> >> +
> >> >> + clear_bam_transaction(nandc);
> >> >> + set_address(host, host->cw_size * start_step, page);
> >> >> + update_rw_regs(host, last_step - start_step, true);
> >> >> + config_nand_page_read(nandc);
> >> >> +
> >> >> + for (i = start_step; i < last_step; i++) {
> >> >> + int data_size1, data_size2, oob_size1, oob_size2;
> >> >> + int reg_off = FLASH_BUF_ACC;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + data_size1 = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (ecc->steps - 1);
> >> >> + oob_size1 = host->bbm_size;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + if (i == (ecc->steps - 1)) {
> >> >> + data_size2 = ecc->size - data_size1 -
> >> >> + ((ecc->steps - 1) << 2);
> >> >> + oob_size2 = (ecc->steps << 2) + host->ecc_bytes_hw +
> >> >> + host->spare_bytes;
> >> >> + } else {
> >> >> + data_size2 = host->cw_data - data_size1;
> >> >> + oob_size2 = host->ecc_bytes_hw + host->spare_bytes;
> >> >> + }
> >> >> +
> >> >> + /*
> >> >> + * Don't perform actual data copy from NAND controller to data
> >> >> + * buffer through DMA for this codeword
> >> >> + */
> >> >> + if (!(read_cw_mask & BIT(i))) {
> >> >> + if (nandc->props->is_bam)
> >> >> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, 0, 1);
> >> >> +
> >> >> + config_nand_cw_read(nandc, false);
> >> >> +
> >> >> + data_buf += data_size1 + data_size2;
> >> >> + oob_buf += oob_size1 + oob_size2;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + continue;
> >> >> + }
> >> >> +
> >> >> + if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> >> >> + read_loc = 0;
> >> >> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> >> >> + read_loc += data_size1;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> >> >> + read_loc += oob_size1;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> >> >> + read_loc += data_size2;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
> >> >> + }
> >> >> +
> >> >> + config_nand_cw_read(nandc, false);
> >> >> +
> >> >> + read_data_dma(nandc, reg_off, data_buf, data_size1, 0);
> >> >> + reg_off += data_size1;
> >> >> + data_buf += data_size1;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + read_data_dma(nandc, reg_off, oob_buf, oob_size1, 0);
> >> >> + reg_off += oob_size1;
> >> >> + oob_buf += oob_size1;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + read_data_dma(nandc, reg_off, data_buf, data_size2, 0);
> >> >> + reg_off += data_size2;
> >> >> + data_buf += data_size2;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + read_data_dma(nandc, reg_off, oob_buf, oob_size2, 0);
> >> >> + oob_buf += oob_size2;
> >> >> + }
> >> >> +
> >> >> + ret = submit_descs(nandc);
> >> >> + if (ret)
> >> >> + dev_err(nandc->dev, "failure to read raw page\n");
> >> >> +
> >> >> + free_descs(nandc);
> >> >> +
> >> >> + if (!ret)
> >> >> + ret = check_flash_errors(host, last_step - start_step);
> >> >> +
> >> >> + return 0;
> >> >> +}
> >> >> +
> >> >> +/*
> >> >> * reads back status registers set by the controller to notify page >> read
> >> >> * errors. this is equivalent to what 'ecc->correct()' would do.
> >> >> */
> >> >> @@ -1839,82 +1947,8 @@ static int qcom_nandc_read_page_raw(struct >> mtd_info *mtd,
> >> >> struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> >> >> int oob_required, int page)
> >> >> {
> >> >> - struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> >> >> - struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> >> >> - u8 *data_buf, *oob_buf;
> >> >> - struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
> >> >> - int i, ret;
> >> >> - int read_loc;
> >> >> -
> >> >> - nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
> >> >> - data_buf = buf;
> >> >> - oob_buf = chip->oob_poi;
> >> >> -
> >> >> - host->use_ecc = false;
> >> >> -
> >> >> - clear_bam_transaction(nandc);
> >> >> - update_rw_regs(host, ecc->steps, true);
> >> >> - config_nand_page_read(nandc);
> >> >> -
> >> >> - for (i = 0; i < ecc->steps; i++) {
> >> >> - int data_size1, data_size2, oob_size1, oob_size2;
> >> >> - int reg_off = FLASH_BUF_ACC;
> >> >> -
> >> >> - data_size1 = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (ecc->steps - 1);
> >> >> - oob_size1 = host->bbm_size;
> >> >> -
> >> >> - if (i == (ecc->steps - 1)) {
> >> >> - data_size2 = ecc->size - data_size1 -
> >> >> - ((ecc->steps - 1) << 2);
> >> >> - oob_size2 = (ecc->steps << 2) + host->ecc_bytes_hw +
> >> >> - host->spare_bytes;
> >> >> - } else {
> >> >> - data_size2 = host->cw_data - data_size1;
> >> >> - oob_size2 = host->ecc_bytes_hw + host->spare_bytes;
> >> >> - }
> >> >> -
> >> >> - if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> >> >> - read_loc = 0;
> >> >> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> >> >> - read_loc += data_size1;
> >> >> -
> >> >> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> >> >> - read_loc += oob_size1;
> >> >> -
> >> >> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> >> >> - read_loc += data_size2;
> >> >> -
> >> >> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
> >> >> - }
> >> >> -
> >> >> - config_nand_cw_read(nandc, false);
> >> >> -
> >> >> - read_data_dma(nandc, reg_off, data_buf, data_size1, 0);
> >> >> - reg_off += data_size1;
> >> >> - data_buf += data_size1;
> >> >> -
> >> >> - read_data_dma(nandc, reg_off, oob_buf, oob_size1, 0);
> >> >> - reg_off += oob_size1;
> >> >> - oob_buf += oob_size1;
> >> >> -
> >> >> - read_data_dma(nandc, reg_off, data_buf, data_size2, 0);
> >> >> - reg_off += data_size2;
> >> >> - data_buf += data_size2;
> >> >> -
> >> >> - read_data_dma(nandc, reg_off, oob_buf, oob_size2, 0);
> >> >> - oob_buf += oob_size2;
> >> >> - }
> >> >> -
> >> >> - ret = submit_descs(nandc);
> >> >> - if (ret)
> >> >> - dev_err(nandc->dev, "failure to read raw page\n");
> >> >> -
> >> >> - free_descs(nandc);
> >> >> -
> >> >> - if (!ret)
> >> >> - ret = check_flash_errors(host, ecc->steps);
> >> >> -
> >> >> - return 0;
> >> >> + return nandc_read_page_raw(mtd, chip, buf, chip->oob_poi, page,
> >> >> + BIT(chip->ecc.steps) - 1);
> >> > > I don't understand this. chip->ecc.steps is constant, right? So you
> >> > always ask for the same subpage?
> >> >> We need to do raw read for subpages in which we got uncorrectable
> >> error in next patch for erased page bitflip detection. This patch >> does
> >> reorganization of raw read and moves common code in helper function
> >> nandc_read_page_raw.
> >> >> For nomral raw read, all the subpages will be read so
> >> BIT(chip->ecc.steps) - 1 is used for qcom_nandc_read_page_raw.
> >> >> While for erased page raw read, only those sub pages will be
> >> read for which the controller gives the uncorrectable error.
> > > Still not okay: the driver should expose a way to do raw reads no
> > matter the length and the start and you should use that in a generic
> > way.
> >
> Thanks Miquel.
> I will explore regarding that.
> Looks like, we can some helper like read_subpage.
Of course, when you implement raw accessors you can have static helpers
to clarify the code.
Regards,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists