lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87a7tuog23.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:41:08 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, tgraf@...g.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] rhashtable: remove outdated comments about grow_decision etc
On Wed, Apr 18 2018, David Miller wrote:
> From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:09:05 +1000
>
>> On Wed, Apr 18 2018, Herbert Xu wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:47:01PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>> grow_decision and shink_decision no longer exist, so remove
>>>> the remaining references to them.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>>
>> Thanks. Is that Ack sufficient for this patch to go upstream, or is
>> there something else that I need to do?
>
> One patch being ACK'd does not release the whole series to be applied
> and the whole series will be treated as a complete unit for that
> purpose.
>
> So if discussion is holding up one patch in the series, it holds up
> the entire series.
>
> So get the entire series in acceptable condition, or submit only one
> change at a time individually and wait for that one to be accepted
> before you submit and ask for feedback on the next one.
>
> I hope that makes things clear for you.
Yes, nice and clear. Thanks a lot!
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists