linux-kernel - Re: [patch 8/9] LICENSES: Add CC-BY-SA-4.0 license text

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1804230936290.6136@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 23 Apr 2018 09:37:14 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
cc:     Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [patch 8/9] LICENSES: Add CC-BY-SA-4.0 license text

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:02:16AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Add the full text of the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license to the kernel tree.  It was
> > copied directly from:
> >     
> >    https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-SA-4.0.html#licenseText
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> 
> As we only have 1 user of this, do we really need it?
> 
> Willy, it's your file, Documentation/core-api/idr.rst that is needing
> this addition to the LICENSES directory.  While I'm all for CC licenses
> for Documentation, we don't seem to be very consistent with them.
> Should this be the "default" license we choose for documentation for now
> on?

I'm all for it. If we can agree than this should move to preferred/ and not
to other/

Thanks,

	tglx