[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180423082428.7930-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:24:28 +0200
From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...nel.org
Cc: brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf test: Adapt test case record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh for s390
perf test case 58 (record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh)
executed on s390x using kernel 4.16.0rc3
displays this result:
# ./perf trace --no-syscalls
-e probe_libc:inet_pton/call-graph=dwarf/ ping -6 -c 1 ::1
probe_libc:inet_pton: (3ffa0240448)
__GI___inet_pton (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
gaih_inet (inlined)
__GI_getaddrinfo (inlined)
main (/usr/bin/ping)
__libc_start_main (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
_start (/usr/bin/ping)
After I installed kernel 4.16.0 the same tests uses
commands
# perf record -e probe_libc:inet_pton/call-graph=dwarf/
-o /tmp/perf.data.abc ping -6 -c 1 ::1
# perf script -i /tmp/perf.data.abc
and displays:
ping 39048 [006] 84230.381198: probe_libc:inet_pton: (3ffa0240448)
140448 __GI___inet_pton (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
fbde1 gaih_inet (inlined)
fe2b9 __GI_getaddrinfo (inlined)
398d main (/usr/bin/ping)
Nothing else changed including glibc elfutils and other libraries
picked up by the build.
The entries for __libc_start_main and _start are missing.
I bisected missing __libc_start_main and _start to commit
3d20c6246690219881786de10d2dda93f616d0ac
("perf unwind: Unwind with libdw doesn't take symfs into account")
When I undo this commit I get this call stack on s390:
[root@...lp76 perf]# ./perf script -i /tmp/perf.data.abc
ping 39048 [006] 84230.381198: probe_libc:inet_pton: (3ffa0240448)
140448 __GI___inet_pton (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
fbde1 gaih_inet (inlined)
fe2b9 __GI_getaddrinfo (inlined)
398d main (/usr/bin/ping)
22fbd __libc_start_main (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
457b _start (/usr/bin/ping)
Looks like dwarf functions dwfl_xxx create different call back
stack trace when using file
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/ping-20161105-7.fc27.s390x.debug instead of
file /usr/bin/ping.
Fix this test case on s390 and do not expect any call back stack
entry after the main() function. Also be more robust and accept a
leading __GI_ prefix in front of getaddrinfo.
On x86 this test case shows the same call stack using
both kernel versions 4.16.0rc3 and 4.16.0 and also
stops at main:
[root@f27 perf]# ./perf script -i /tmp/perf.data.tmr
ping 4446 [000] 172.027088: probe_libc:inet_pton: (7fdfa08c93c0)
1393c0 __GI___inet_pton (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
fe60d getaddrinfo (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
2f40 main (/usr/bin/ping)
[root@f27 perf]#
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
index 1ecc1f0ff84a..016882dbbc16 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
@@ -19,12 +19,10 @@ trace_libc_inet_pton_backtrace() {
expected[1]=".*inet_pton[[:space:]]\($libc\)$"
case "$(uname -m)" in
s390x)
- eventattr='call-graph=dwarf'
+ eventattr='call-graph=dwarf,max-stack=4'
expected[2]="gaih_inet.*[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$"
- expected[3]="__GI_getaddrinfo[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$"
+ expected[3]="(__GI_)?getaddrinfo[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$"
expected[4]="main[[:space:]]\(.*/bin/ping.*\)$"
- expected[5]="__libc_start_main[[:space:]]\($libc\)$"
- expected[6]="_start[[:space:]]\(.*/bin/ping.*\)$"
;;
*)
eventattr='max-stack=3'
--
2.14.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists