[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180423092011.qnhcorgcu2j5hrls@verge.net.au>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:20:14 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 7/8] ARM: shmobile: Remove the ARCH_SHMOBILE Kconfig
symbol
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> All drivers for Renesas ARM SoCs have gained proper ARCH_RENESAS
> platform dependencies. Hence finish the conversion from ARCH_SHMOBILE
> to ARCH_RENESAS for Renesas 32-bit ARM SoCs, as started by commit
> 9b5ba0df4ea4f940 ("ARM: shmobile: Introduce ARCH_RENESAS").
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
> This depends on the previous patches in this series, hence the RFC.
>
> JFTR, after this, the following symbols for drivers supporting only
> Renesas SuperH "SH-Mobile" SoCs can no longer be selected:
> - CONFIG_KEYBOARD_SH_KEYSC,
> - CONFIG_VIDEO_SH_VOU,
> - CONFIG_VIDEO_SH_MOBILE_CEU,
> - CONFIG_DRM_SHMOBILE[*],
> - CONFIG_FB_SH_MOBILE_MERAM.
> (changes for a shmobile_defconfig .config)
>
> [*] CONFIG_DRM_SHMOBILE has a dependency on ARM, but it was never wired
> up. From the use of sh_mobile_meram, I guess it was meant for
> SH-Mobile AP4 on Mackerel or AP4EVB, which are long gone.
> So the only remaining upstream platforms that could make use of it
> are legacy SuperH SH-Mobile SoCs?
That sounds about right. If there is interest I can sift through my mail
archive and see if it yields any answers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists