[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180423113753.GA8630@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 13:37:53 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
samuel@...lland.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Coreboot <coreboot@...eboot.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] coreboot table bus and framebuffer driver
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:22:04PM +0000, Julius Werner wrote:
> [resend in plain text]
>
> > It would be great to get some of the google developers to ack these, as
> > this touches their code...
>
> From the coreboot point of view I guess we're fine with it since it claims
> to maintain all of the existing functionality. It's just changing the
> kernel-level plumbing for these drivers and I don't really have the
> expertise to comment on whether this is better or worse than the old code
> (maybe Dmitry or Guenter will?). It seems a little odd to me to call this a
> "bus", but if we think that's the most fitting abstraction the kernel has
> for it, I'm okay with that. All I care about is that it will work (in all
> combinations... e.g. regardless of probe order and even if some parts are
> compiled as modules and loaded/unloaded at runtime).
Thanks for the response, patches are all now queued up.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists