[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1524452624-27589-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 20:03:27 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel.opensrc@...il.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, npiggin@...il.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/21] rcu: Make rcu_gp_kthread() check for early-boot activity
The rcu_gp_kthread() function immediately sleeps waiting to be notified
of the need for a new grace period, which currently works because there
are a number of code sequences that will provide the needed wakeup later.
However, some of these code sequences need to acquire the root rcu_node
structure's ->lock, and contention on that lock has started manifesting.
This commit therefore makes rcu_gp_kthread() check for early-boot activity
when it starts up, omitting the initial sleep in that case.
Reported-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 79fb99951a0c..497f139056c7 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2192,6 +2192,12 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
struct rcu_state *rsp = arg;
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+ /* Check for early-boot work. */
+ raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
+ if (need_any_future_gp(rnp))
+ WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags, RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
+
rcu_bind_gp_kthread();
for (;;) {
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists