| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1524452624-27589-14-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 20:03:37 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel.opensrc@...il.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, npiggin@...il.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/21] rcu: Inline rcu_start_gp_advanced() into rcu_start_future_gp()
The rcu_start_gp_advanced() is invoked only from rcu_start_future_gp() and
much of its code is redundant when invoked from that context. This commit
therefore inlines rcu_start_gp_advanced() into rcu_start_future_gp(),
then removes rcu_start_gp_advanced().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 56 ++++++++++++-------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 25dbbc753fef..4433f68a1c7b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -524,8 +524,6 @@ module_param(rcu_kick_kthreads, bool, 0644);
static ulong jiffies_till_sched_qs = HZ / 10;
module_param(jiffies_till_sched_qs, ulong, 0444);
-static bool rcu_start_gp_advanced(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
- struct rcu_data *rdp);
static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int (*f)(struct rcu_data *rsp));
static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp);
static int rcu_pending(void);
@@ -1679,7 +1677,8 @@ static void trace_rcu_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
* rcu_node structure's ->need_future_gp field. Returns true if there
* is reason to awaken the grace-period kthread.
*
- * The caller must hold the specified rcu_node structure's ->lock.
+ * The caller must hold the specified rcu_node structure's ->lock, which
+ * is why the caller is responsible for waking the grace-period kthread.
*/
static bool __maybe_unused
rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
@@ -1687,7 +1686,8 @@ rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
{
unsigned long c;
bool ret = false;
- struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rdp->rsp);
+ struct rcu_state *rsp = rdp->rsp;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rsp);
raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
@@ -1695,7 +1695,7 @@ rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
* Pick up grace-period number for new callbacks. If this
* grace period is already marked as needed, return to the caller.
*/
- c = rcu_cbs_completed(rdp->rsp, rnp);
+ c = rcu_cbs_completed(rsp, rnp);
trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, TPS("Startleaf"));
if (need_future_gp_element(rnp, c)) {
trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, TPS("Prestartleaf"));
@@ -1727,7 +1727,7 @@ rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
* period in progress, it will be smaller than the one we obtained
* earlier. Adjust callbacks as needed.
*/
- c = rcu_cbs_completed(rdp->rsp, rnp_root);
+ c = rcu_cbs_completed(rsp, rnp_root);
if (!rcu_is_nocb_cpu(rdp->cpu))
(void)rcu_segcblist_accelerate(&rdp->cblist, c);
@@ -1748,7 +1748,12 @@ rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, TPS("Startedleafroot"));
} else {
trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, TPS("Startedroot"));
- ret = rcu_start_gp_advanced(rdp->rsp, rnp_root, rdp);
+ if (!rsp->gp_kthread)
+ goto unlock_out; /* No grace-period kthread yet! */
+ WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags, rsp->gp_flags | RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT);
+ trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, READ_ONCE(rsp->gpnum),
+ TPS("newreq"));
+ ret = true; /* Caller must wake GP kthread. */
}
unlock_out:
if (rnp != rnp_root)
@@ -2299,43 +2304,6 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
}
/*
- * Start a new RCU grace period if warranted, re-initializing the hierarchy
- * in preparation for detecting the next grace period. The caller must hold
- * the root node's ->lock and hard irqs must be disabled.
- *
- * Note that it is legal for a dying CPU (which is marked as offline) to
- * invoke this function. This can happen when the dying CPU reports its
- * quiescent state.
- *
- * Returns true if the grace-period kthread must be awakened.
- */
-static bool
-rcu_start_gp_advanced(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
- struct rcu_data *rdp)
-{
- raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
- if (!rsp->gp_kthread || !cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp)) {
- /*
- * Either we have not yet spawned the grace-period
- * task, this CPU does not need another grace period,
- * or a grace period is already in progress.
- * Either way, don't start a new grace period.
- */
- return false;
- }
- WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags, RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT);
- trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, READ_ONCE(rsp->gpnum),
- TPS("newreq"));
-
- /*
- * We can't do wakeups while holding the rnp->lock, as that
- * could cause possible deadlocks with the rq->lock. Defer
- * the wakeup to our caller.
- */
- return true;
-}
-
-/*
* Report a full set of quiescent states to the specified rcu_state data
* structure. Invoke rcu_gp_kthread_wake() to awaken the grace-period
* kthread if another grace period is required. Whether we wake
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists