[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180423150435.GS17484@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 09:04:35 -0600
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: hughd@...gle.com, hch@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH] mm: shmem: make stat.st_blksize return huge page
size if THP is on
On Sun 22-04-18 21:28:59, Yang Shi wrote:
>
>
> On 4/22/18 6:47 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > will be used on the first aligned address even when the initial/last
> > portion of the mapping is not THP aligned.
>
> No, my test shows it is not. And, transhuge_vma_suitable() does check the
> virtual address alignment. If it is not huge page size aligned, it will not
> set PMD for huge page.
It's been quite some time since I've looked at that code but I think you
are wrong. It just doesn't make sense to make the THP decision on the
VMA alignment much. Kirill, can you clarify please?
Please note that I have no objections to actually export the huge page
size as the max block size but your changelog just doesn't make any
sense to me.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists