[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <051f977b-b274-d94b-61f7-dece19770624@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:50:07 +0100
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/22] iommu: introduce page response function
On 23/04/18 13:16, Jacob Pan wrote:
> I shall drop these, only put in here to match your patch. i am looking
> into converting vt-d svm prq to your queued fault patch. I think it will
> give both functional and performance benefit.
Thanks, I just rebased my patches onto this series and am hoping to
re-send the IOMMU part early next month.
Jean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists