[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180423172840.GA13383@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:28:40 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
mawilcox@...rosoft.com,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fs: dax: Adding new return type vm_fault_t
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 09:42:30PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > OK, fair enough and thanks for doing an audit! So possibly just add a
> > comment above vmf_insert_mixed() and vmf_insert_mixed_mkwrite() like:
> >
> > /*
> > * If the insertion of PTE failed because someone else already added a
> > * different entry in the mean time, we treat that as success as we assume
> > * the same entry was actually inserted.
> > */
> >
> > After that feel free to add:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> >
> > to the patch.
> >
>
> Thanks , will add this in change log and send v4.
Jan asked you to add this comment above vmf_insert_mixed_mkwrite()
(I don't think it needs to be added above vmf_insert_mixed() because
this comment will get moved in a later commit once we have no more callers
of vm_insert_mixed()).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists