lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1524588689.21176.506.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:51:29 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, sohil.mehta@...el.com,
        mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/io: Define readq()/writeq() to use 64-bit
 type

On Sat, 2018-03-31 at 20:45 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >   [tip:x86/urgent 14/14]
> > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c:1690:22: sparse:
> > > > incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
> > > > 
> > > > Since you were on Cc: of that report I assumed you'd take care
> > > > of it.
> > > 
> > > Ah, yes. This one I fixed.
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/commit
> > /?h=for-next&id=71591d1280e5ef02c2af2ffb9801d0c842973be9
> 
> Yeah, so this fix in the RDMA tree needs to go upstream first, before
> we can apply 
> the changes to the interface. Could you resend at around v4.17-rc1 or
> so?

Btw, should I recend or you can still pick it up from linux-next or
mailing list?

I can resend tomorrow if needed.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ