[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180424041559.32410-6-mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 14:15:59 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Cc: npiggin@...il.com, msuchanek@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/64: Use barrier_nospec in syscall entry
Our syscall entry is done in assembly so patch in an explicit
barrier_nospec.
Based on a patch by Michal Suchanek.
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
---
mpe: Move the barrier to immediately prior to the vulnerable load,
and add a comment trying to explain why. Drop the barrier from
syscall_dotrace, because that syscall number comes from the
kernel.
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
index 51695608c68b..de30f9a34c0c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#include <asm/context_tracking.h>
#include <asm/tm.h>
#include <asm/ppc-opcode.h>
+#include <asm/barrier.h>
#include <asm/export.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S
#include <asm/exception-64s.h>
@@ -178,6 +179,15 @@ system_call: /* label this so stack traces look sane */
clrldi r8,r8,32
15:
slwi r0,r0,4
+
+ barrier_nospec_asm
+ /*
+ * Prevent the load of the handler below (based on the user-passed
+ * system call number) being speculatively executed until the test
+ * against NR_syscalls and branch to .Lsyscall_enosys above has
+ * committed.
+ */
+
ldx r12,r11,r0 /* Fetch system call handler [ptr] */
mtctr r12
bctrl /* Call handler */
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists