linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: acer-wmi: add another KEY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VdMHqo=S+xgFPSv7U+3mHn7DpjXC0KSgSZB+wDZLwRV4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 21:33:14 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@...ian.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Antonio Rosario Intilisano <antonio.intilisano@...il.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        "vger@...nel.org" <vger@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>,
        Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: acer-wmi: add another KEY_POWER keycode

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:23 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
<locutusofborg@...ian.org> wrote:
> Hello Andy,
>
>>Or I missed the point and it's working? Tell me what to do with it.
>>For now I pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!
>
>
> Antonio did patch and build a custom kernel locally (testing was successful), and submitted
> the patch to me.
>
> I pinged some Ubuntu folks to get it applied, and also testing with the .deb provided
> by kernel team was good, so I presume this is a safe patch that can be applied right now
> as-is.
> (this is a trivial patch, Antonio told me in another channel that he can also create and post
> failures logs before and after, as well as do some video with the key pressed).
>
> I don't think this is needed, but if you want it for historical purposes, just ask and we will
> do our best to provide them!

Thanks for a sync.

What I asked before still stands, i.e. would be nice to have Tested-by
tag by someone who actually tested the change.

Feel free to respond here with it I hope patchwork catch it up.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko