linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: ufs: Extract devfreq registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <41c6fd36826ee853c86b3fb3e069903c@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 14:08:09 -0700
From:   Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: ufs: Extract devfreq registration

On 2018-04-23 17:20, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Failing to register with devfreq leaves hba->devfreq assigned, which
> causes the error path to dereference the ERR_PTR(). Rather than bolting
> on more conditionals, move the call of devm_devfreq_add_device() into
> it's own function and only update hba->devfreq once it's successfully
> registered.
> 
> The subsequent patch builds upon this to make UFS actually work again,
> as it's been broken since f1d981eaecf8 ("PM / devfreq: Use the 
> available
> min/max frequency")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 8f22a980b1a7..2253f24309ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -1255,6 +1255,26 @@ static struct devfreq_dev_profile 
> ufs_devfreq_profile = {
>  	.get_dev_status	= ufshcd_devfreq_get_dev_status,
>  };
> 
> +static int ufshcd_devfreq_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	struct devfreq *devfreq;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(hba->dev,
> +			&ufs_devfreq_profile,
> +			"simple_ondemand",
> +			NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(devfreq)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(devfreq);
> +		dev_err(hba->dev, "Unable to register with devfreq %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	hba->devfreq = devfreq;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
> @@ -6399,16 +6419,9 @@ static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  				sizeof(struct ufs_pa_layer_attr));
>  			hba->clk_scaling.saved_pwr_info.is_valid = true;
>  			if (!hba->devfreq) {
> -				hba->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(hba->dev,
> -							&ufs_devfreq_profile,
> -							"simple_ondemand",
> -							NULL);
> -				if (IS_ERR(hba->devfreq)) {
> -					ret = PTR_ERR(hba->devfreq);
> -					dev_err(hba->dev, "Unable to register with devfreq %d\n",
> -							ret);
> +				ret = ufshcd_devfreq_init(hba);
> +				if (ret)
>  					goto out;
> -				}
>  			}
>  			hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = true;
>  		}

Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project