linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: tps65911-comparator: Fix an off by one bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180424054529.2gv2l24muxzh2n6b@dell>
Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 06:45:29 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: tps65911-comparator: Fix an off by one bug

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> I really don't want authorship credit for a patch that does:
> 
> #define COMP1 0
> #define COMP2 1
> 
> It just makes me itch to look at it...

As I say, I get where you're coming from, but it was the decision made
by the H/W engineers.  Doesn't mean it's not the correct thing to do
from a S/W POV.

If you're not happy putting your SOB on the patch, I'll draft it and
sign it off.  /me has no shame!

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog