[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <803cf7fa-6c74-0506-d609-8f0b79b2c254@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:04:01 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwei.bie@...el.com, jfreimann@...hat.com, wexu@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC V3 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring for vhost
On 2018年04月24日 04:11, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:59:43PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 03:31:20PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:34:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> Hi all:
>>>>
>>>> This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with
>>>> Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and
>>>> tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream
>>>> and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring.
>>> I have to ask then - what is the benefit of this?
>> You can use this with dpdk within guest.
>> The DPDK version did see a performance improvement so hopefully with
> Is there a link to this performance improvement document?
>
You probably want to this:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@dpdk.org/msg97735.html
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists