linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] backlight: pwm_bl: don't use GPIOF_* with gpiod_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180424100723.hyt3vxa2wp7sruqz@dell>
Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 11:07:23 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] backlight: pwm_bl: don't use GPIOF_* with
 gpiod_get_direction

On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:12:57AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:32:40PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> > > The documentation was wrong, gpiod_get_direction() returns 0/1 instead
> >> > > of the GPIOF_* flags. The docs were fixed with commit 94fc73094abe47
> >> > > ("gpio: correct docs about return value of gpiod_get_direction"). Now,
> >> > > fix this user (until a better, system-wide solution is in place).
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> >> > > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> >> >
> >> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
> >>
> >> Thanks for the Reviewed-by Simon.  I have applied it to the original mail.
> >>
> >> Do you know why you mail wasn't sent attached to the original thread?
> >> For some reason I received this mail on it's own i.e. not in reply
> >> to the original.
> >
> > No, not off hand. Perhaps I responded to the email in some unusual way
> > but by now I don't recall. In any case I'll try to be more careful
> > in future.
> 
> I see Lee is using gmail for sending, so I assume also for receiving.

Well I'm using their servers, but my set-up is IMAP/Mutt.

> While I did receive Simon's reply in-thread, lately I had issues with gmail
> not always doing so, and sometimes failing to do deduplication when receiving
> email through multiple paths (mailing lists and/or directly).

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog