linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove bypass in arm_smmu_reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:57:06 +0800
From:   Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
        <joro@...tes.org>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <liubo95@...wei.com>, <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove bypass in
 arm_smmu_reset_device

Hi Robin,

Thanks for your comment!
On 2018/4/24 0:07, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 23/04/18 12:45, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> Add a bypass parameter in arm_smmu_device to keep whether smmu device
>> should pypass or not, so parameter bypass in arm_smmu_reset_device can
>> be removed.
> 
> Given that the GBPA configuration implied by the bypass argument here
> is only there to avoid initialising a full stream table when the firmware
> is terminally broken, I wonder if it would make sense to simply skip
> allocating a stream table at all in that case. Then we could just base
> the subsequent SMMUEN/GPBA decision on whether strtab_cfg.strtab is valid or not.
> 
Yes, it may save many memory, and should be care about not access strtab when attach
device or other similar scenario, anyway software can achieve this after move bypass
to struct arm_smmu_device.

Thanks
Yisheng
> Robin.
>