[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180424133527.GB24599@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 14:35:27 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: support __int128 with clang
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 06:20:11PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Would you review/merge this when you have a chance?
No real objection from me, but does the arm64 kernel actually build with
clang?
Will
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
> > Commit fb8722735f50 ("arm64: support __int128 on gcc 5+") added support
> > for arm64 __int128 with gcc with a version-conditional, but neglected to
> > enable this for clang, which in fact appears to support aarch64 __int128.
> > This commit therefore enables it if the compiler is clang, using the
> > same type of makefile conditional used elsewhere in the tree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/Makefile | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> > index b481b4a7c011..16c2e8b58546 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> > @@ -57,7 +57,11 @@ KBUILD_AFLAGS += $(lseinstr) $(brokengasinst)
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mabi=lp64)
> > KBUILD_AFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mabi=lp64)
> >
> > +ifeq ($(cc-name),clang)
> > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -DCONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128
> > +else
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-ifversion, -ge, 0500, -DCONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128)
> > +endif
> >
> > ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN), y)
> > KBUILD_CPPFLAGS += -mbig-endian
> > --
> > 2.15.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists