linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] ALSA: xen-front: Implement Xen event channel handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f37a8eb9-8733-eae9-4c3e-312d864592fc@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:58:43 +0300
From:   Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@...il.com>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, perex@...ex.cz,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@...m.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] ALSA: xen-front: Implement Xen event channel
 handling

On 04/24/2018 05:35 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 16:29:15 +0200,
> Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 04/24/2018 05:20 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 08:24:51 +0200,
>>> Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>>> +static irqreturn_t evtchnl_interrupt_req(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct xen_snd_front_evtchnl *channel = dev_id;
>>>> +	struct xen_snd_front_info *front_info = channel->front_info;
>>>> +	struct xensnd_resp *resp;
>>>> +	RING_IDX i, rp;
>>>> +	unsigned long flags;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (unlikely(channel->state != EVTCHNL_STATE_CONNECTED))
>>>> +		return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>>> +
>>>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
>>>> +
>>>> +again:
>>>> +	rp = channel->u.req.ring.sring->rsp_prod;
>>>> +	/* ensure we see queued responses up to rp */
>>>> +	rmb();
>>>> +
>>>> +	for (i = channel->u.req.ring.rsp_cons; i != rp; i++) {
>>> I'm not familiar with Xen stuff in general, but through a quick
>>> glance, this kind of code worries me a bit.
>>>
>>> If channel->u.req.ring.rsp_cons has a bogus number, this may lead to a
>>> very long loop, no?  Better to have a sanity check of the ring buffer
>>> size.
>> In this loop I have:
>> resp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&channel->u.req.ring, i);
>> and the RING_GET_RESPONSE macro is designed in the way that
>> it wraps around when *i* in the question gets bigger than
>> the ring size:
>>
>> #define RING_GET_REQUEST(_r, _idx)                    \
>>      (&((_r)->sring->ring[((_idx) & (RING_SIZE(_r) - 1))].req))
>>
>> So, even if the counter has a bogus number it will not last long
> Hm, this prevents from accessing outside the ring buffer, but does it
> change the loop behavior?
no, it doesn't
> Suppose channel->u.req.ring_rsp_cons = 1, and rp = 0, the loop below
> would still consume the whole 32bit counts, no?
>
> 	for (i = channel->u.req.ring.rsp_cons; i != rp; i++) {
> 		resp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&channel->u.req.ring, i);
> 		...
> 	}
You are right here and the comment is totally valid.
I'll put an additional check like here [1] and here [2]
Will this address your comment?
>
> Takashi
Thank you,
Oleksandr

[1] 
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.17-rc2/source/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c#L1127
[2] 
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.17-rc2/source/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c#L1135