linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] arm64/kernel: rename module_emit_adrp_veneer->module_emit_veneer_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180424103943.453d3449bbe2b35b86cc3443@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 10:39:43 -0500
From:   Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team@....com,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v2] arm64/kernel: rename
 module_emit_adrp_veneer->module_emit_veneer_for_adrp

Commit a257e02579e ("arm64/kernel: don't ban ADRP to work around
Cortex-A53 erratum #843419") introduced a function whose name ends with
"_veneer".

This clashes with commit bd8b22d2888e ("Kbuild: kallsyms: ignore veneers
emitted by the ARM linker"), which removes symbols ending in "_veneer"
from kallsyms.

The problem was manifested as 'perf test -vvvvv vmlinux' failed,
correctly claiming the symbol 'module_emit_adrp_veneer' was present in
vmlinux, but not in kallsyms.

...
    ERR : 0xffff00000809aa58: module_emit_adrp_veneer not on kallsyms
...
    test child finished with -1
    ---- end ----
    vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms: FAILED!

Fix the problem by renaming module_emit_adrp_veneer to 
module_emit_veneer_for_adrp.  Now the test passes.

Fixes: a257e02579e ("arm64/kernel: don't ban ADRP to work around Cortex-A53 erratum #843419")
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
---
v2: fixed naming and wording of last sentence in commit text.

 arch/arm64/include/asm/module.h | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/module.c      | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/module.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/module.h
index b6dbbe3123a9..97d0ef12e2ff 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/module.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/module.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct mod_arch_specific {
 u64 module_emit_plt_entry(struct module *mod, void *loc, const Elf64_Rela *rela,
 			  Elf64_Sym *sym);
 
-u64 module_emit_adrp_veneer(struct module *mod, void *loc, u64 val);
+u64 module_emit_veneer_for_adrp(struct module *mod, void *loc, u64 val);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE
 extern u64 module_alloc_base;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c
index fa3637284a3d..f0690c2ca3e0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ u64 module_emit_plt_entry(struct module *mod, void *loc, const Elf64_Rela *rela,
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_843419
-u64 module_emit_adrp_veneer(struct module *mod, void *loc, u64 val)
+u64 module_emit_veneer_for_adrp(struct module *mod, void *loc, u64 val)
 {
 	struct mod_plt_sec *pltsec = !in_init(mod, loc) ? &mod->arch.core :
 							  &mod->arch.init;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/module.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/module.c
index 719fde8dcc19..155fd91e78f4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/module.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/module.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static int reloc_insn_adrp(struct module *mod, __le32 *place, u64 val)
 		insn &= ~BIT(31);
 	} else {
 		/* out of range for ADR -> emit a veneer */
-		val = module_emit_adrp_veneer(mod, place, val & ~0xfff);
+		val = module_emit_veneer_for_adrp(mod, place, val & ~0xfff);
 		if (!val)
 			return -ENOEXEC;
 		insn = aarch64_insn_gen_branch_imm((u64)place, val,
-- 
2.17.0