linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: Switch to interrupted wait to recover from ring hang.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8736zkd1jz.fsf@xmission.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Apr 2018 11:14:24 -0500
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@....com>
Cc:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <Alexander.Deucher@....com>, <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
        <David.Panariti@....com>, <oleg@...hat.com>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: Switch to interrupted wait to recover from ring hang.

Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@....com> writes:

> If the ring is hanging for some reason allow to recover the waiting
> by sending fatal signal.
>
> Originally-by: David Panariti <David.Panariti@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
> index eb80edf..37a36af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
> @@ -421,10 +421,16 @@ int amdgpu_ctx_wait_prev_fence(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx, unsigned ring_id)
>  
>  	if (other) {
>  		signed long r;
> -		r = dma_fence_wait_timeout(other, false, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> -		if (r < 0) {
> -			DRM_ERROR("Error (%ld) waiting for fence!\n", r);
> -			return r;
> +
> +		while (true) {
> +			if ((r = dma_fence_wait_timeout(other, true,
> +					MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT)) >= 0)
> +				return 0;
> +
> +			if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
> +				DRM_ERROR("Error (%ld) waiting for fence!\n", r);
> +				return r;
> +			}

It looks like if you make this code say:
			if (fatal_signal_pending(current) ||
			    (current->flags & PF_EXITING)) {
				DRM_ERROR("Error (%ld) waiting for fence!\n", r);
				return r;
>  		}
>  	}

Than you would not need the horrible hack want_signal to deliver signals
to processes who have passed exit_signal() and don't expect to need
their signal handling mechanisms anymore.

Eric