lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:21:00 -0400
From:   Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     freude@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        cohuck@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, alifm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        thuth@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@...hat.com,
        fiuczy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/15] KVM: s390: interfaces to (de)configure guest's
 AP matrix

On 04/23/2018 09:46 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 15/04/2018 23:22, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> Provides interfaces to assign AP adapters, usage domains
>> and control domains to a KVM guest.
>>
>> A KVM guest is started by executing the Start Interpretive Execution 
>> (SIE)
>> instruction. The SIE state description is a control block that 
>> contains the
>> state information for a KVM guest and is supplied as input to the SIE
>> instruction. The SIE state description has a satellite structure 
>> called the
>> Crypto Control Block (CRYCB). The CRYCB contains three bitmask fields
>> identifying the adapters, queues (domains) and control domains 
>> assigned to
>> the KVM guest:
>>
>> * The AP Adapter Mask (APM) field identifies the AP adapters assigned to
>>    the KVM guest
>>
>> * The AP Queue Mask (AQM) field identifies the AP queues assigned to
>>    the KVM guest. Each AP queue is connected to a usage domain within
>>    an AP adapter.
>>
>> * The AP Domain Mask (ADM) field identifies the control domains
>>    assigned to the KVM guest.
>> - as well as the
>> allocation of bitmaps -
>> Each adapter, queue (usage domain) and control domain are identified by
>> a number from 0 to 255. The bits in each mask, from most significant to
>> least significant bit, correspond to the numbers 0-255. When a bit is
>> set, the corresponding adapter, queue (usage domain) or control domain
>> is assigned to the KVM guest.
>>
>> This patch will set the bits in the APM, AQM and ADM fields of the
>> CRYCB referenced by the KVM guest's SIE state description. The process
>> used is:
>>
>> 1. Verify that the bits to be set do not exceed the maximum bit
>>     number for the given mask.
>>
>> 2. Verify that the APQNs that can be derived from the intersection
>>     of the bits set in the APM and AQM fields of the KVM guest's CRYCB
>>     are not assigned to any other KVM guest running on the same linux
>>     host.
>>
>> 3. Set the APM, AQM and ADM in the CRYCB according to the matrix
>>     configured for the mediated matrix device via its sysfs
>>     adapter, domain and control domain attribute files respectively.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h        |   79 ++++++++++
>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c                |  259 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c     |   19 +++
>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h |    4 +
>>   4 files changed, 361 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h 
>> b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h
>> index a6c092e..a068244 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h
>> @@ -12,6 +12,34 @@
>>
>>   #include <linux/types.h>
>>   #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>> +
>> +#define KVM_AP_MASK_BYTES(n)    DIV_ROUND_UP(n, BITS_PER_BYTE)
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * The AP matrix is comprised of three bit masks identifying the 
>> adapters,
>> + * queues (domains) and control domains that belong to an AP matrix. 
>> The bits in
>> + * each mask, from least significant to most significant bit, 
>> correspond to IDs
>> + * 0 to the maximum ID allowed for a given mask. When a bit is set, the
>> + * corresponding ID belongs to the matrix.
>> + *
>> + * @apm_max: max number of bits in @apm
>> + * @apm identifies the AP adapters in the matrix
>> + * @aqm_max: max number of bits in @aqm
>> + * @aqm identifies the AP queues (domains) in the matrix
>> + * @adm_max: max number of bits in @adm
>> + * @adm identifies the AP control domains in the matrix
>> + */
>> +struct kvm_ap_matrix {
>> +    int apm_max;
>> +    unsigned long *apm;
>> +    int aqm_max;
>> +    unsigned long *aqm;
>> +    int adm_max;
>> +    unsigned long *adm;
>> +};
>>
>>   /**
>>    * kvm_ap_instructions_installed()
>> @@ -51,4 +79,55 @@
>>    */
>>   int kvm_ap_interpret_instructions(struct kvm *kvm, bool enable);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * kvm_ap_matrix_create
>> + *
>> + * Create an AP matrix to hold a configuration of AP adapters, 
>> domains and
>> + * control domains.
>> + *
>> + * @ap_matrix: holds the matrix that is created
>> + *
>> + * Returns 0 if the matrix is successfully created. Returns an error 
>> if an APQN
>> + * derived from the cross product of the AP adapter IDs and AP queue 
>> indexes
>> + * comprising the AP matrix is configured for another guest.
>> + */
>> +int kvm_ap_matrix_create(struct kvm_ap_matrix **ap_matrix);
>
> why not simply return the pointer?

The function returns a value indicating the reason a matrix could not be 
created.
Returning a NULL pointer provides no clue as to why the call failed.

>
>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * kvm_ap_matrix_destroy
>> + *
>> + * Destroy an AP matrix by de-allocating all storage allocated by the
>> + * kvm_ap_matrix_create function.
>> + *
>> + * @ap_matrix: the matrix to destroy
>> + */
>> +void kvm_ap_matrix_destroy(struct kvm_ap_matrix *ap_matrix);
>> + - as well as the
>> allocation of bitmaps -
>> +/**
>> + * kvm_ap_configure_matrix
>> + *
>> + * Configure the AP matrix for a KVM guest.
>> + *
>> + * @kvm:         the KVM guest
>> + * @matrix:         the matrix configuration information
>> + *
>> + * Returns 0 if:
>> + *    1. The AP instructions are installed on the guest
>> + *    2. The APQNs derived from the intersection of the set of adapter
>> + *       IDs (APM) and queue indexes (AQM) in @matrix are not 
>> configured for
>> + *       any other KVM guest running on the same linux host.
>> + * Otherwise returns an error code.
>> + */
>> +int kvm_ap_configure_matrix(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_ap_matrix 
>> *matrix);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * kvm_ap_deconfigure_matrix
>> + *
>> + * Deconfigure the AP matrix for a KVM guest. Clears all of the bits 
>> in the
>> + * APM, AQM and ADM in the guest's CRYCB.
>> + *
>> + * @kvm: the KVM guest
>> + */
>> +void kvm_ap_deconfigure_matrix(struct kvm *kvm);
>> +
>>   #endif /* _ASM_KVM_AP */
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c
>> index 55d11b5..f7226d8 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>   #include <asm/kvm-ap.h>
>>   #include <asm/ap.h>
>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>>
>>   #include "kvm-s390.h"
>>
>> @@ -78,3 +79,261 @@ int kvm_ap_interpret_instructions(struct kvm 
>> *kvm, bool enable)
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_ap_interpret_instructions);
>> +
>> +static inline void kvm_ap_clear_crycb_masks(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> +    memset(&kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb0, 0,
>> +           sizeof(kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb0));
>> +    memset(&kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb1, 0,
>> +           sizeof(kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb1));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned long *kvm_ap_get_crycb_apm(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long *apm;
>> +
>> +    switch (kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd & CRYCB_FORMAT_MASK) {
>> +    case CRYCB_FORMAT1:
>> +        apm = (unsigned long *)kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb0.apm;
>> +        break;
>> +    case CRYCB_FORMAT2:
>> +        apm = (unsigned long *)kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb1.apm;
>> +        break;
>> +    default:
>> +        apm = (unsigned long *)kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb0.apm;
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return apm;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned long *kvm_ap_get_crycb_aqm(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long *aqm;
>> +
>> +    switch (kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd & CRYCB_FORMAT_MASK) {
>> +    case CRYCB_FORMAT1:
>> +        aqm = (unsigned long *)kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb0.aqm;
>> +        break;
>> +    case CRYCB_FORMAT2:
>> +        aqm = (unsigned long *)kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb1.aqm;
>> +        break;
>> +    default:
>> +        aqm = (unsigned long *)kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb0.aqm;
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return aqm;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned long *kvm_ap_get_crycb_adm(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long *adm;
>> +
>> +    switch (kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd & CRYCB_FORMAT_MASK) {
>> +    case CRYCB_FORMAT1:
>> +        adm = (unsigned long *)kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb0.adm;
>> +        break;
>> +    case CRYCB_FORMAT2:
>> +        adm = (unsigned long *)kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb1.adm;
>> +        break;
>> +    default:
>> +        adm = (unsigned long *)kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb0.adm;
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return adm;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void kvm_ap_set_crycb_masks(struct kvm *kvm,
>> +                   struct kvm_ap_matrix *matrix)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long *apm = kvm_ap_get_crycb_apm(kvm);
>> +    unsigned long *aqm = kvm_ap_get_crycb_aqm(kvm);
>> +    unsigned long *adm = kvm_ap_get_crycb_adm(kvm);
>> +
>> +    kvm_ap_clear_crycb_masks(kvm);
>> +    memcpy(apm, matrix->apm, KVM_AP_MASK_BYTES(matrix->apm_max));
>> +    memcpy(aqm, matrix->aqm, KVM_AP_MASK_BYTES(matrix->aqm_max));
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Merge the AQM and ADM since the ADM is a superset of the
>> +     * AQM by agreed-upon convention.
>> +     */
>> +    bitmap_or(adm, adm, aqm, matrix->adm_max);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void kvm_ap_log_sharing_err(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long apid,
>> +                   unsigned long apqi)
>> +{
>> +    pr_err("%s: AP queue %02lx.%04lx is registered to guest %s", 
>> __func__,
>> +           apid, apqi, kvm->arch.dbf->name);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * kvm_ap_validate_queue_sharing
>> + *
>> + * Verifies that the APQNs derived from the cross product of the AP 
>> adapter IDs
>> + * and AP queue indexes comprising the AP matrix are not configured for
>> + * another guest. AP queue sharing is not allowed.
>> + *
>> + * @kvm: the KVM guest
>> + * @matrix: the AP matrix
>> + *
>> + * Returns 0 if the APQNs are valid, otherwise; returns -EBUSY.
>> + */
>> +static int kvm_ap_validate_queue_sharing(struct kvm *kvm,
>> +                     struct kvm_ap_matrix *matrix)
>> +{
>> +    struct kvm *vm;
>> +    unsigned long *apm, *aqm;
>> +    unsigned long apid, apqi;
>> +
>> +
>> +    /* No other VM may share an AP Queue with the input VM */
>
> I wonder if these functions and structures should really belong to KVM.
> The only have sense with the VFIO driver.
> My opinion is that they belong there, in the VFIO driver code.

I disagree for two reasons:

1. The vfio_ap driver should not have to know how to configure the KVM
    guest's matrix nor anything else about KVM for that matter.

2. The interfaces and structures defined in kvm-ap.h and implemented
in kvm-ap.c don't have anything to do with VFIO and can stand alone
    to be used by any client code to configure a guest's matrix.

>
>
> This will also make it easier to handle cases where AP code is not 
> present
> but KVM is.

That issue is being resolved by making the required zcrypt interfaces 
static.

>
>
>> +    list_for_each_entry(vm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
>> +        if (kvm == vm)
>> +            continue;
>> +
>> +        apm = kvm_ap_get_crycb_apm(vm);
>> +        if (!bitmap_and(apm, apm, matrix->apm, matrix->apm_max))
>> +            continue;
>> +
>> +        aqm = kvm_ap_get_crycb_aqm(vm);
>> +        if (!bitmap_and(aqm, aqm, matrix->aqm, matrix->aqm_max))
>> +            continue;
>> +
>> +        for_each_set_bit_inv(apid, apm, matrix->apm_max)
>> +            for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi, aqm, matrix->aqm_max)
>> +                kvm_ap_log_sharing_err(kvm, apid, apqi);
>> +
>> +        return -EBUSY;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int kvm_ap_matrix_apm_create(struct kvm_ap_matrix *ap_matrix,
>> +                    struct ap_config_info *config)
>> +{
>> +    int apm_max = (config && config->apxa) ? config->Na + 1 : 16;
>
> At this moment you already know the format of the crycb.

How?

> Why don't you just use a virtual CRYCB instead of allocating bitmaps.
> It would be much easier to handle and compare.

What do you mean by a virtual CRYCB?

After thinking about this more, I think allocating bitmaps is a bit of
overkill. I think I can get rid of this function entirely to simplify
things a great deal.

>
>
>
>> +
>> +    ap_matrix->apm = kzalloc(KVM_AP_MASK_BYTES(apm_max), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!ap_matrix->apm)
>> +        return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +    ap_matrix->apm_max = apm_max;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int kvm_ap_matrix_aqm_create(struct kvm_ap_matrix *ap_matrix,
>> +                    struct ap_config_info *config)
>> +{
>> +    int aqm_max = (config && config->apxa) ? config->Nd + 1 : 16;
>> +
>> +    ap_matrix->aqm = kzalloc(KVM_AP_MASK_BYTES(aqm_max), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!ap_matrix->aqm)
>> +        return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +    ap_matrix->aqm_max = aqm_max;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int kvm_ap_matrix_adm_create(struct kvm_ap_matrix *ap_matrix,
>> +                    struct ap_config_info *config)
>> +{
>> +    int adm_max = (config && config->apxa) ? config->Nd + 1 : 16;
>> +
>> +    ap_matrix->adm = kzalloc(KVM_AP_MASK_BYTES(adm_max), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!ap_matrix->adm)
>> +        return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +    ap_matrix->adm_max = adm_max;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void kvm_ap_matrix_masks_destroy(struct kvm_ap_matrix 
>> *ap_matrix)
>> +{
>> +    kfree(ap_matrix->apm);
>> +    kfree(ap_matrix->aqm);
>> +    kfree(ap_matrix->adm);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int kvm_ap_matrix_create(struct kvm_ap_matrix **ap_matrix)
>> +{
>
> It seems much easier to me to return a pointer to the allocated 
> kvm_ap_matrix
> than to provide the address of the pointer to update.

See my reasons above. The point may be moot, because I think I'm going 
to get
rid of the create and destroy functions.

>
>
>> +    int ret;
>> +    struct kvm_ap_matrix *matrix;
>> +    struct ap_config_info config;
>> +    struct ap_config_info *config_info = NULL;
>> +
>> +    memset(&config, 0, sizeof(config));
>> +
>> +    ret = ap_query_configuration(&config);
>> +    if (ret) {
>> +        if (ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> +            return ret;
>> +    } else {
>> +        config_info = &config;
>> +    }
> since you give a non NULL argument you can make this test easier as
> if (ret)
>     return ret;

Not true .... the query function can return an error due to an exception
in which case we want to simply return the error.  It can also return 
-EOPNOTSUPP
because STFLE.12 is not set in which case we want to continue.

>
>
> I do not think that you really need both config and config_info.

True.

>
>
>> +
>> +    matrix = kzalloc(sizeof(*matrix), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!matrix)
>> +        return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +    ret = kvm_ap_matrix_apm_create(matrix, config_info);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        goto mask_create_err;
>> +
>> +    ret = kvm_ap_matrix_aqm_create(matrix, config_info);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        goto mask_create_err;
>> +
>> +    ret = kvm_ap_matrix_adm_create(matrix, config_info);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        goto mask_create_err;
>> +
>> +    *ap_matrix = matrix;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +
>> +mask_create_err:
>> +    kvm_ap_matrix_masks_destroy(matrix);
>> +    kfree(matrix);
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_ap_matrix_create);
>> +
>> +void kvm_ap_matrix_destroy(struct kvm_ap_matrix *ap_matrix)
>> +{
>> +    kvm_ap_matrix_masks_destroy(ap_matrix);
>> +    kfree(ap_matrix);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_ap_matrix_destroy);
>> +
>> +int kvm_ap_configure_matrix(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_ap_matrix 
>> *matrix)
>> +{
>> +    int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +    mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
>> +
>> +    ret = kvm_ap_validate_queue_sharing(kvm, matrix);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        goto done;
>> +
>> +    kvm_ap_set_crycb_masks(kvm, matrix);
>> +
>> +done:
>> +    mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_ap_configure_matrix);
>> +
>> +void kvm_ap_deconfigure_matrix(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> +    kvm_ap_clear_crycb_masks(kvm);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_ap_deconfigure_matrix);
>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c 
>> b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>> index d41b0b8..647ea24 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/device.h>
>>   #include <linux/list.h>
>>   #include <linux/ctype.h>
>> +#include <asm/kvm-ap.h>
>>
>>   #include "vfio_ap_private.h"
>>
>> @@ -18,8 +19,23 @@
>>
>>   static int vfio_ap_mdev_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct 
>> mdev_device *mdev)
>>   {
>> +    int ret;
>> +    struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
>>       struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix = to_ap_matrix(mdev_parent_dev(mdev));
>> +    struct kvm_ap_matrix *matrix;
>> +
>> +    ret = kvm_ap_matrix_create(&matrix);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        return ret;
>> +
>> +    matrix_mdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*matrix_mdev), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!matrix_mdev) {
>> +        kvm_ap_matrix_destroy(matrix);
>> +        return -ENOMEM;
>> +    }
>>
>> +    matrix_mdev->matrix = matrix;
>> +    mdev_set_drvdata(mdev, matrix_mdev);
>>       ap_matrix->available_instances--;
>>
>>       return 0;
>> @@ -28,7 +44,10 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_create(struct kobject 
>> *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
>>   static int vfio_ap_mdev_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
>>   {
>>       struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix = to_ap_matrix(mdev_parent_dev(mdev));
>> +    struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev);
>>
>> +    kvm_ap_matrix_destroy(matrix_mdev->matrix);
>> +    kfree(matrix_mdev);
>>       ap_matrix->available_instances++;
>>
>>       return 0;
>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h 
>> b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
>> index c47aeec..f248faf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
>> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ struct ap_matrix {
>>       int available_instances;
>>   };
>>
>> +struct ap_matrix_mdev {
>> +    struct kvm_ap_matrix *matrix;
>> +};
>> +
>>   static inline struct ap_matrix *to_ap_matrix(struct device *dev)
>>   {
>>       return container_of(dev, struct ap_matrix, device);
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ