linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Rearrange select_task_rq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:48:50 -0700
From:   Rohit Jain <rohit.k.jain@...cle.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joel.opensrc@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Rearrange select_task_rq_fair() to optimize
 it



On 04/24/2018 07:51 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24-04-18, 15:34, Rohit Jain wrote:
>> Including the "unlikely" suggestion and the original patch, as expected
>> with a quick hackbench test on a 44 core 2 socket x86 machine causes no
>> change in performance.
> Want me to include your Tested-by in next version ?
>

Please feel free to include it.

I was not sure if this is too small a test to say tested by.