linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] PCI: Make pci_get_new_domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <db40716e-85ac-a91d-98a9-81accb2b6756@siemens.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 19:21:12 +0200
From:   Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] PCI: Make pci_get_new_domain_nr static

On 2018-04-25 18:27, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:13:37PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>>
>> The only user of that function is of_pci_bus_find_domain_nr. Pure
>> cleanup.
> 
> "The only user of pci_get_new_domain_nr() is of_pci_bus_find_domain_nr().
> Since they are defined in the same compilation unit,
> pci_get_new_domain_nr() can be made static, which also simplifies
> preprocessor conditionals.
> 
> No functional change intended."
> 

Thanks, wording adopted for v2.

Jan

>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/pci.c   | 6 ++----
>>  include/linux/pci.h | 3 ---
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index e597655a5643..695c2bb4e853 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -5702,15 +5702,14 @@ static void pci_no_domains(void)
>>  #endif
>>  }
>>  
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
>>  static atomic_t __domain_nr = ATOMIC_INIT(-1);
>>  
>> -int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void)
>> +static int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void)
>>  {
>>  	return atomic_inc_return(&__domain_nr);
>>  }
>>  
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
>>  static int of_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct device *parent)
>>  {
>>  	static int use_dt_domains = -1;
>> @@ -5765,7 +5764,6 @@ int pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
>>  			       acpi_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(bus);
>>  }
>>  #endif
>> -#endif
>>  
>>  /**
>>   * pci_ext_cfg_avail - can we access extended PCI config space?
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index 73178a2fcee0..963232a6cd2e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -1510,12 +1510,10 @@ void pci_cfg_access_unlock(struct pci_dev *dev);
>>   */
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
>>  extern int pci_domains_supported;
>> -int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void);
>>  #else
>>  enum { pci_domains_supported = 0 };
>>  static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return 0; }
>>  static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return 0; }
>> -static inline int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) { return -ENOSYS; }
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */
>>  
>>  /*
>> @@ -1670,7 +1668,6 @@ static inline struct pci_dev *pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(int domain,
>>  
>>  static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return 0; }
>>  static inline struct pci_dev *pci_dev_get(struct pci_dev *dev) { return NULL; }
>> -static inline int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) { return -ENOSYS; }
>>  
>>  #define dev_is_pci(d) (false)
>>  #define dev_is_pf(d) (false)
>> -- 
>> 2.13.6
>>