lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c39cb438-1e8a-4f2c-50f6-c6e2a144487b@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:40:54 -0400
From:   Andrey Grodzovsky <Andrey.Grodzovsky@....com>
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Alexander.Deucher@....com, Christian.Koenig@....com,
        David.Panariti@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/scheduler: Don't call wait_event_killable for
 signaled process.



On 04/25/2018 01:17 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/25, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
>> here (drm_sched_entity_fini) is also a bad idea, but we still want to be
>> able to exit immediately
>> and not wait for GPU jobs completion when the reason for reaching this code
>> is because of KILL
>> signal to the user process who opened the device file.
> Can you hook f_op->flush method?

But this one is called for each task releasing a reference to the the 
file, so not sure I see how this solves the problem.

Andrey

>
> Oleg.
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ