[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180425194915.GH4064@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 21:49:15 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/rt: Rework for_each_process_thread() iterations
in tg_has_rt_tasks()
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:06:31PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> @@ -2406,12 +2407,15 @@ static inline int tg_has_rt_tasks(struct task_group *tg)
> if (task_group_is_autogroup(tg))
> return 0;
>
> - for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> - if (rt_task(p) && task_group(p) == tg)
> - return 1;
> - }
> + css_task_iter_start(&tg->css, 0, &it);
> + while ((task = css_task_iter_next(&it)))
> + if (rt_task(task)) {
> + ret = 1;
> + break;
> + }
Aside from the missing {} there, the patch looks OK I suppose.
The races found seems somewhat dodgy, but like you argue, they're not in
fact new :/
> + css_task_iter_end(&it);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists