[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1524699755-29388-1-git-send-email-rishabhb@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:42:35 -0700
From: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org, abderrahmane.benbachir@...ymtl.ca
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tsoni@...eaurora.org,
ckadabi@...eaurora.org, Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] trace: initcall: Ordered comparison of function pointers
Using initcall_t in the __field macro generates the follwing warning
with clang version 6.0:
include/trace/events/initcall.h:34:3: warning: ordered comparison of
function pointers ('initcall_t' (aka 'int (*)(void)') and 'initcall_t')
__field macro expands to __field_ext macro which does is_signed_type
check on the type argument. Since initcall_t is defined as a function
pointer, using it as the type in the __field macro, leads to an ordered
comparison of function pointer warning, inside the check. Using
__field_struct macro avoids the issue.
Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
---
include/trace/events/initcall.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/initcall.h b/include/trace/events/initcall.h
index 8d6cf10..46f5f7c 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/initcall.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/initcall.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
TP_ARGS(func),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
- __field(initcall_t, func)
+ __field_struct(initcall_t, func)
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
TP_ARGS(func, ret),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
- __field(initcall_t, func)
+ __field_struct(initcall_t, func)
__field(int, ret)
),
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists