[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180425064133.GC5352@amd>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:41:33 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Javier Arteaga <javier@...tex.com>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Dan O'Donovan <dan@...tex.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH RESEND 2/3] leds: upboard: Add LED support
On Sat 2018-04-21 09:50:08, Javier Arteaga wrote:
> Allow userspace to use the on-board LEDs as "upboard:<color>:".
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Arteaga <javier@...tex.com>
> +static enum led_brightness upboard_led_brightness_get(struct led_classdev *cdev)
> +{
> + struct upboard_led *led = container_of(cdev, struct upboard_led, cdev);
> + int brightness = 0;
> +
> + regmap_field_read(led->field, &brightness);
> +
> + return brightness;
> +};
I'm slightly confused here. Is each led controlled by single bit?
> +static void upboard_led_brightness_set(struct led_classdev *cdev,
> + enum led_brightness brightness)
> +{
> + struct upboard_led *led = container_of(cdev, struct upboard_led, cdev);
> +
> + regmap_field_write(led->field, brightness != LED_OFF);
> +};
What is going on with ";" at end of function? We don't do that.
If it is single bit, max_brightness should be one, and != LED_OFF test
should not be needed.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists