linux-kernel - Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180425074151.GA2271@ulmo>
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:41:51 +0200
From:   Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        "moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:43:35PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:23:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > For more fun:
> > 
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg173630.html
> > 
> > Yeah, sometimes we want to disable the iommu because the on-gpu
> > pagetables are faster ...
> 
> I am not on this list, but remote NAK from here.  This needs an
> API from the iommu/dma-mapping code.  Drivers have no business poking
> into these details.

The interfaces that the above patch uses are all EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL,
which is rather misleading if they are not meant to be used by drivers
directly.

> Thierry, please resend this with at least the iommu list and
> linux-arm-kernel in Cc to have a proper discussion on the right API.

I'm certainly open to help with finding a correct solution, but the
patch above was purposefully terse because this is something that I
hope we can get backported to v4.16 to unbreak Nouveau. Coordinating
such a backport between ARM and DRM trees does not sound like something
that would help getting this fixed in v4.16.

The fundamental issue here is that the DMA/IOMMU integration is
something that has caused a number of surprising regressions in the past
because it tends to sneak in unexpectedly. For example the current
regression shows up only if CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU=y because the DMA
API will then transparently create a second mapping and mess things up.
Everything works fine if that option is disabled. This is ultimately why
we didn't notice, since we don't enable that option by default. I do
have a patch that I plan to apply to the Tegra tree that will always
enable CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU=y on Tegra to avoid any such surprises
in the future, but I can obviously only apply that once the above patch
is applied to Nouveau, otherwise we'll break Nouveau unconditionally.

Granted, this issue could've been caught with a little more testing, but
in retrospect I think it would've been a lot better if ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU
was just enabled unconditionally if it has side-effects that platforms
don't opt in to but have to explicitly opt out of.

Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)