[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1524645199-5596-1-git-send-email-gkohli@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:03:19 +0530
From: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@...eaurora.org>
To: peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mpe@...erman.id.au,
mingo@...nel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@...eaurora.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1] kthread/smpboot: Serialize kthread parking against wakeup
The control cpu thread which initiates hotplug calls kthread_park()
for hotplug thread and sets KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK. After this control
thread wakes up the hotplug thread. There is a chance that wakeup
code sees the hotplug thread (running on AP core) in INTERRUPTIBLE
state, but sets its state to RUNNING after hotplug thread has entered
kthread_parkme() and changed its state to TASK_PARKED. This can result
in panic later on in kthread_unpark(), as it sees KTHREAD_IS_PARKED
flag set but fails to rebind the kthread, due to it being not in
TASK_PARKED state. Fix this, by serializing wakeup state change,
against state change before parking the kthread.
Below is the possible race:
Control thread Hotplug Thread
kthread_park()
set KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK
smpboot_thread_fn
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
kthread_parkme
wake_up_process()
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
if (!(p->state & state)) -> this will fail
goto out;
__kthread_parkme
__set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
ttwu_remote()
p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
schedule();
So to avoid this race, take pi_lock to serial state changes.
Suggested-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>
Co-developed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@...eaurora.org>
---
Changes since V1:
- Add comment to explain need of pi_lock.
diff --git a/kernel/smpboot.c b/kernel/smpboot.c
index 5043e74..c5c5184 100644
--- a/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -122,7 +122,45 @@ static int smpboot_thread_fn(void *data)
}
if (kthread_should_park()) {
+ /*
+ * Serialize against wakeup. If we take the lock first,
+ * wakeup is skipped. If we run later, we observe,
+ * TASK_RUNNING update from wakeup path, before moving
+ * forward. This helps avoid the race, where wakeup
+ * observes TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, and also observes
+ * the TASK_PARKED in kthread_parkme() before updating
+ * task state to TASK_RUNNING. In this case, kthread
+ * gets parked in TASK_RUNNING state. This results
+ * in panic later on in kthread_unpark(), as it sees
+ * KTHREAD_IS_PARKED flag set but fails to rebind the
+ * kthread, due to it being not in TASK_PARKED state.
+ *
+ * Control thread Hotplug Thread
+ *
+ * kthread_park()
+ * set KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK
+ * smpboot_thread_fn()
+ * set_current_state(
+ * TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ * kthread_parkme()
+ *
+ * wake_up_process()
+ *
+ * raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+ * if (!(p->state & state)) __set_current_state(
+ * goto out; TASK_RUNNING);
+ *
+ * __set_current_state(
+ * TASK_PARKED);
+ *
+ * if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
+ * ttwu_remote()
+ * p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
+ * schedule();
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock(¤t->pi_lock);
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock);
preempt_enable();
if (ht->park && td->status == HP_THREAD_ACTIVE) {
BUG_ON(td->cpu != smp_processor_id());
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists