[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180425093808.GA15875@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:38:08 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] PCI: tegra: use seq_open_data
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:41:05PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 11:42:07AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 12:37:24AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > > Simplify the code slightly by having seq_open_data do the ->private
> > > assignment.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 11 +----------
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > I had to go hunt for patch 1/5 to be able to tell if this is indeed
> > equivalent. It is, so:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>
> I can't apply this patch standalone so I assume this will go via
> some other tree; I will drop it from the PCI patch queue, if I
> should not please do let me know.
I would kindly ask you some feedback - where are we with this patch
series ? Please let me know if should consider it for the pci tree
as per my request above.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists