lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:53:55 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Javier Arteaga <javier@...tex.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dan O'Donovan <dan@...tex.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH RESEND 0/3] UP Squared board drivers

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 09:50:06AM +0100, Javier Arteaga wrote:
> [linux-kernel correctly Cc'd on the series now. Sorry for the noise.]
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This series adds platform support for AAEON's UP Squared, a x86 SBC
> based on Apollo Lake [1]. Specifically, it enables control for the board
> pin headers and for the LEDs, as both of these features are only
> available behind a FPGA-based platform controller.
> 
> This is structured around a MFD driver that provides a regmap interface
> to that platform controller to each MFD cell.
> 
> The series is carved out from an out-of-tree support patchset, initially
> written by Dan O'Donovan for the original UP Board [2] and then extended
> through the past year to support new entries in the lineup (UP Board, UP
> Squared and UP Core) [3].
> 
> Here we only submit support for UP Squared to simplify review. Still,
> the driver is designed so that it can easily gain support for the other
> boards.
> 
> Questions:
> 
> * Is MFD the right fit for the platform controller?
>   The intention here is to encapsulate the custom GPIO-bitbanged control
>   protocol by sharing the regmap between the drivers.
> 
> * Is our use of two chained pinctrls (in patch 3/3) valid?

There are few minor comments but other than that, to me this looks like
a reasonable approach.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ