linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 172/183] RDMA/core: Reduce poll batch for direct cq polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180425103249.422929682@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:36:32 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Sergey Gorenko <sergeygo@...lanox.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 172/183] RDMA/core: Reduce poll batch for direct cq polling

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>


[ Upstream commit d3b9e8ad425cfd5b9116732e057f1b48e4d3bcb8 ]

Fix warning limit for kernel stack consumption:

drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c: In function 'ib_process_cq_direct':
drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c:78:1: error: the frame size of 1032 bytes
is larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]

Using smaller ib_wc array on the stack brings us comfortably below that
limit again.

Fixes: 246d8b184c10 ("IB/cq: Don't force IB_POLL_DIRECT poll context for ib_process_cq_direct")
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Gorenko <sergeygo@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c |   21 +++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 
 /* # of WCs to poll for with a single call to ib_poll_cq */
 #define IB_POLL_BATCH			16
+#define IB_POLL_BATCH_DIRECT		8
 
 /* # of WCs to iterate over before yielding */
 #define IB_POLL_BUDGET_IRQ		256
@@ -25,18 +26,18 @@
 #define IB_POLL_FLAGS \
 	(IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP | IB_CQ_REPORT_MISSED_EVENTS)
 
-static int __ib_process_cq(struct ib_cq *cq, int budget, struct ib_wc *poll_wc)
+static int __ib_process_cq(struct ib_cq *cq, int budget, struct ib_wc *wcs,
+			   int batch)
 {
 	int i, n, completed = 0;
-	struct ib_wc *wcs = poll_wc ? : cq->wc;
 
 	/*
 	 * budget might be (-1) if the caller does not
 	 * want to bound this call, thus we need unsigned
 	 * minimum here.
 	 */
-	while ((n = ib_poll_cq(cq, min_t(u32, IB_POLL_BATCH,
-			budget - completed), wcs)) > 0) {
+	while ((n = ib_poll_cq(cq, min_t(u32, batch,
+					 budget - completed), wcs)) > 0) {
 		for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
 			struct ib_wc *wc = &wcs[i];
 
@@ -48,8 +49,7 @@ static int __ib_process_cq(struct ib_cq
 
 		completed += n;
 
-		if (n != IB_POLL_BATCH ||
-		    (budget != -1 && completed >= budget))
+		if (n != batch || (budget != -1 && completed >= budget))
 			break;
 	}
 
@@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ static int __ib_process_cq(struct ib_cq
  */
 int ib_process_cq_direct(struct ib_cq *cq, int budget)
 {
-	struct ib_wc wcs[IB_POLL_BATCH];
+	struct ib_wc wcs[IB_POLL_BATCH_DIRECT];
 
-	return __ib_process_cq(cq, budget, wcs);
+	return __ib_process_cq(cq, budget, wcs, IB_POLL_BATCH_DIRECT);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_process_cq_direct);
 
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int ib_poll_handler(struct irq_po
 	struct ib_cq *cq = container_of(iop, struct ib_cq, iop);
 	int completed;
 
-	completed = __ib_process_cq(cq, budget, NULL);
+	completed = __ib_process_cq(cq, budget, cq->wc, IB_POLL_BATCH);
 	if (completed < budget) {
 		irq_poll_complete(&cq->iop);
 		if (ib_req_notify_cq(cq, IB_POLL_FLAGS) > 0)
@@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static void ib_cq_poll_work(struct work_
 	struct ib_cq *cq = container_of(work, struct ib_cq, work);
 	int completed;
 
-	completed = __ib_process_cq(cq, IB_POLL_BUDGET_WORKQUEUE, NULL);
+	completed = __ib_process_cq(cq, IB_POLL_BUDGET_WORKQUEUE, cq->wc,
+				    IB_POLL_BATCH);
 	if (completed >= IB_POLL_BUDGET_WORKQUEUE ||
 	    ib_req_notify_cq(cq, IB_POLL_FLAGS) > 0)
 		queue_work(ib_comp_wq, &cq->work);