linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 06/11] vsprintf: Factor out %p[iI] handler as ip_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:12:46 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Tobin C . Harding" <me@...in.cc>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 06/11] vsprintf: Factor out %p[iI] handler as ip_addr_string()

Move the non-trivial code from the long pointer() function. We are going
to add a check for the access to the address that will make it even more
complicated.

Also it is better to warn about unknown specifier instead of falling
back to the %p behavior. It will help people to understand what is
going wrong. They expect the IP address and not a pointer anyway
in this situation.

Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
---
 lib/vsprintf.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index 587175a528b7..92793060bb1f 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -1387,6 +1387,39 @@ char *ip4_addr_string_sa(char *buf, char *end, const struct sockaddr_in *sa,
 }
 
 static noinline_for_stack
+char *ip_addr_string(char *buf, char *end, const void *ptr,
+		     struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt)
+{
+	char *err_fmt_msg;
+
+	switch (fmt[1]) {
+	case '6':
+		return ip6_addr_string(buf, end, ptr, spec, fmt);
+	case '4':
+		return ip4_addr_string(buf, end, ptr, spec, fmt);
+	case 'S': {
+		const union {
+			struct sockaddr		raw;
+			struct sockaddr_in	v4;
+			struct sockaddr_in6	v6;
+		} *sa = ptr;
+
+		switch (sa->raw.sa_family) {
+		case AF_INET:
+			return ip4_addr_string_sa(buf, end, &sa->v4, spec, fmt);
+		case AF_INET6:
+			return ip6_addr_string_sa(buf, end, &sa->v6, spec, fmt);
+		default:
+			return valid_string(buf, end, "(invalid address)",
+					    spec);
+		}}
+	}
+
+	err_fmt_msg = fmt[0] == 'i' ? "(%pi?)" : "(%pI?)";
+	return valid_string(buf, end, err_fmt_msg, spec);
+}
+
+static noinline_for_stack
 char *escaped_string(char *buf, char *end, u8 *addr, struct printf_spec spec,
 		     const char *fmt)
 {
@@ -1888,29 +1921,7 @@ char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
 					 * 4:	001.002.003.004
 					 * 6:   000102...0f
 					 */
-		switch (fmt[1]) {
-		case '6':
-			return ip6_addr_string(buf, end, ptr, spec, fmt);
-		case '4':
-			return ip4_addr_string(buf, end, ptr, spec, fmt);
-		case 'S': {
-			const union {
-				struct sockaddr		raw;
-				struct sockaddr_in	v4;
-				struct sockaddr_in6	v6;
-			} *sa = ptr;
-
-			switch (sa->raw.sa_family) {
-			case AF_INET:
-				return ip4_addr_string_sa(buf, end, &sa->v4, spec, fmt);
-			case AF_INET6:
-				return ip6_addr_string_sa(buf, end, &sa->v6, spec, fmt);
-			default:
-				return valid_string(buf, end,
-						    "(invalid address)", spec);
-			}}
-		}
-		break;
+		return ip_addr_string(buf, end, ptr, spec, fmt);
 	case 'E':
 		return escaped_string(buf, end, ptr, spec, fmt);
 	case 'U':
-- 
2.13.6